Income Tax

Rejected goods cannot be considered for valuation of closing stock, hence no concealment of income – ITAT

Rejected goods cannot be considered for valuation of closing stock. Therefore there was concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2561 (2018) (10) ITAT

In the instant case, the appellant assessee had filed the appeal against the order of the CIT(A) confirming penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing and export of leather goods.

During the year under consideration, some of the goods sold by the assessee were rejected. These rejected raw material were also available in the business premises of the assessee.

Since due to the rejected raw material / goods there was a difference in valuation of stock, the Assessing Officer took it into consideration for the purpose of making addition on the basis of the closing stock valuation.

The assessee submitted that if the rejected goods were not taken into consideration, there cannot be any addition. The consequent levy of penalty was not justified.

Moreover, it was contended that due to difference in valuation of closing stock, it could not be said that the assessee had furnished inaccurate particulars of his income or concealed any part of his income.

The Tribunal opined that when the assessee rejected some goods and purchased only the balance, the rejected pieces cannot be considered for valuation of closing stock. Therefore, it cannot be said that there was concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income.

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the orders of both the authorities below and the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer as confirmed by the CIT(Appeals) was deleted.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Merely twofold increase in share prices no reason to doubt or disbelieve the transaction

Merely because share prices doubled, it may not have given rise to any doubt to disbelieve the transaction – High…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Income tax authority duty bound to comply with the decision of Supreme Court

It is the bounden duty of income tax authority to comply with the decision of the Supreme Court – High…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal withdrawn against rejection u/s 12AB as assessee was availing benefit u/s 10(23C)(iiiad)

ITAT allows withdrawal of appeal against rejection of registration u/s 12AB as assessee had been availing benefit of blanket exemption…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay not mala fide, right of hearing on merit not to be rejected – ITAT

When explanation for delay does not smack of mala fide, right of hearing of appeal on merit ought not to…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme

ITAT allows exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit the amount in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme and new asset…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No addition to be made in hands of assessee solely on basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet

Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…

3 days ago