Income Tax

Reopening notice u/s 148A quashed as assessee’s reply was not visible on e-filing portal

Reopening notice u/s 148A quashed as assessee’s reply was not visible on e-filing portal due to technical glitch

In a recent judgment the Hon’ble High Court has quashed the reopening notice issued u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). as assessee’s reply was not visible on income tax e-filing portal due to technical glitch

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3879 (2024) (02) HC

In the instant case, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court against the order passed under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act.

The grievance of the petitioner was that though the petitioner had submitted a reply on on electronic mode to the show cause notice issued to it under clause (b) of Section 148A of the Act, the same had not been considered by the Income Tax Department (ITD) and it was erroneously stated that there was no reply filed by the petitioner at all to the said show cause notice.

The ITD admitted that the petitioner did file a reply to the show cause notice but the same had not been considered, as it was not reflected on the on-line portal of the Income Tax Department due to technical error. It was admitted that the petitioner had filed its reply within allowed time.

The Division Bench opined that in view of the facts of the case, the impugned order passed by the ITD could not be sustained.

Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court allowed the writ petition. The Order passed under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act as well as consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Act were quashed and set aside.

The Income Tax Department was directed to consider the reply filed by the petitioner and then pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law, and communicate it to the petitioner.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago