Income Tax

Reopening notice u/s 148A quashed as assessee’s reply was not visible on e-filing portal

Reopening notice u/s 148A quashed as assessee’s reply was not visible on e-filing portal due to technical glitch

In a recent judgment the Hon’ble High Court has quashed the reopening notice issued u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). as assessee’s reply was not visible on income tax e-filing portal due to technical glitch

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3879 (2024) (02) HC

In the instant case, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court against the order passed under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act.

The grievance of the petitioner was that though the petitioner had submitted a reply on on electronic mode to the show cause notice issued to it under clause (b) of Section 148A of the Act, the same had not been considered by the Income Tax Department (ITD) and it was erroneously stated that there was no reply filed by the petitioner at all to the said show cause notice.

The ITD admitted that the petitioner did file a reply to the show cause notice but the same had not been considered, as it was not reflected on the on-line portal of the Income Tax Department due to technical error. It was admitted that the petitioner had filed its reply within allowed time.

The Division Bench opined that in view of the facts of the case, the impugned order passed by the ITD could not be sustained.

Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court allowed the writ petition. The Order passed under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act as well as consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Act were quashed and set aside.

The Income Tax Department was directed to consider the reply filed by the petitioner and then pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law, and communicate it to the petitioner.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A quashed for no satisfaction on what was under reporting & misreporting by assessee

Penalty u/s 270A quashed as there was no satisfaction in the penalty order on what exactly was under reporting of…

1 hour ago
  • GST

Govt has notified the Manipur Goods & Services Tax (2nd Amendment) Act 2025

Govt has notified the Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2025 The Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha…

2 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Small Company threshold of paid up capital and turnover increased w.e.f 1st December 2025

Small Company threshold of paid-up capital increased to Rs. ten crores and turnover to Rs. hundred crores w.e.f. 1st December…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

For registration u/s 12AA if CIT satisfaction limited to objects or also to activities? SLP admitted

For registration u/s 12AA if Commissioner’s satisfaction is limited to the objects of the Institution, or also to genuineness of…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Over 30 approvals u/s 153D within minutes amounted to total non-application of mind

Over 30 approvals u/s 153D granted within minutes amounted to total non-application of mind – Bombay High Court In a…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

When disallowance is made u/s 37(1) section 69C is not applicable – ITAT

When AO invoked provisions of section 37(1) to disallow purchases, provisions of section 69C of the Act are not applicable…

2 days ago