Income Tax

Reopening notice u/s 148A quashed as assessee’s reply was not visible on e-filing portal

Reopening notice u/s 148A quashed as assessee’s reply was not visible on e-filing portal due to technical glitch

In a recent judgment the Hon’ble High Court has quashed the reopening notice issued u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). as assessee’s reply was not visible on income tax e-filing portal due to technical glitch

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3879 (2024) (02) HC

In the instant case, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court against the order passed under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act.

The grievance of the petitioner was that though the petitioner had submitted a reply on on electronic mode to the show cause notice issued to it under clause (b) of Section 148A of the Act, the same had not been considered by the Income Tax Department (ITD) and it was erroneously stated that there was no reply filed by the petitioner at all to the said show cause notice.

The ITD admitted that the petitioner did file a reply to the show cause notice but the same had not been considered, as it was not reflected on the on-line portal of the Income Tax Department due to technical error. It was admitted that the petitioner had filed its reply within allowed time.

The Division Bench opined that in view of the facts of the case, the impugned order passed by the ITD could not be sustained.

Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court allowed the writ petition. The Order passed under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act as well as consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Act were quashed and set aside.

The Income Tax Department was directed to consider the reply filed by the petitioner and then pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law, and communicate it to the petitioner.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Discontinuance of business of firm will not vest ownership of firm’s property with partners

Discontinuance of business of partnership firm will not result in vesting ownership of firm's property with individual partners for capital…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B within 120 days is directory not mandatory

Stipulation of 120 days for release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B is directory not mandatory – Delhi High Court In…

18 hours ago
  • ICAI

ICAI issues FAQs on key accounting implications arising from New Labour Codes

FAQs on key accounting implications arising from the New Labour Codes Recently, Government consolidated existing labour laws into four new…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80-IA(7) not allowed for delayed filing of audit report in Form 10CCB

Filing audit report in Form 10CCB within due date is mandatory. The assessee cannot claim deduction u/s 80-IA(7) he ground…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Is CSR expenditure is allowable under section 80G of Income Tax Act – ITAT says “Yes”

CSR expenditure of companies is allowable under section 80G unless fall under the two exceptions specified. In a recent judgment,…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Territorial jurisdiction of ITAT is determined on the basis of situs of Assessing Officer

Jurisdiction of ITAT is determined not by the place of business or residence of assessee but by the location of…

2 days ago