Income Tax

Reopening notice u/s 148A quashed as assessee’s reply was not visible on e-filing portal

Reopening notice u/s 148A quashed as assessee’s reply was not visible on e-filing portal due to technical glitch

In a recent judgment the Hon’ble High Court has quashed the reopening notice issued u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). as assessee’s reply was not visible on income tax e-filing portal due to technical glitch

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3879 (2024) (02) HC

In the instant case, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court against the order passed under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act.

The grievance of the petitioner was that though the petitioner had submitted a reply on on electronic mode to the show cause notice issued to it under clause (b) of Section 148A of the Act, the same had not been considered by the Income Tax Department (ITD) and it was erroneously stated that there was no reply filed by the petitioner at all to the said show cause notice.

The ITD admitted that the petitioner did file a reply to the show cause notice but the same had not been considered, as it was not reflected on the on-line portal of the Income Tax Department due to technical error. It was admitted that the petitioner had filed its reply within allowed time.

The Division Bench opined that in view of the facts of the case, the impugned order passed by the ITD could not be sustained.

Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court allowed the writ petition. The Order passed under clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act as well as consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Act were quashed and set aside.

The Income Tax Department was directed to consider the reply filed by the petitioner and then pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law, and communicate it to the petitioner.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

7 days ago