Income Tax

Retirement funds received by partner of firm not taxable and not in the nature of goodwill also-ITAT

Retirement funds received by partner of firm not taxable and not in the nature of goodwill also. Receiving of money on retirement from firm is exempt-ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 1108 (2017) (01) ITAT

Assessment Year : 2004-05
Date of Pronouncement: 05-01-2017

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:
CIT Vs. Riyaz A. Sheikh (2014) 41 taxman.com 455 (Bom)
Prashant S. Joshi v. ITO (2010) 324 ITR 154 (Bom)
CIT V/s. R. Lingamallu Rajkumar reported in [2001] 247 ITR 801

Brief Facts of the Case:
The assessee was partner in a partnership firm. A survey was conducted u/s 133A in which certain incriminating documents and loose papers pertaining to the assessee was found from the premises of the firm. During the course of survey proceedings, the department found that the assessee partner had received a sum of Rs. 36,42,860/- being transferred / relinquishment of right by the assessee in the firm, but she had not offered the sum to tax.

Treating the sum not disclosed as income escaping assessment, the Assessing Office (AO) reopened the assessment by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and finally he added the same to the return of income of the assessee treated it as income from undisclosed sources u/s 68.

Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A), who also confirmed the action of the AO, but CIT(A) held that the amount received was in the nature of goodwill and was liable to be taxed as such.

Observations made by the Tribunal:
The Tribunal observed that the assessee along with her other family members were partners in the firm and vide retirement deed the assessee retired and received the said payments along with other family members.

As per retirement deed, the retiring parties acknowledged the receipt payment in full settlement of their shares and agreed that the remaining parties will carry on the business of partnership and property of the firm.

The Tribunal observed that in the instant case the assessee had not taken any property while relinquishing her share in the partnership firm but she had taken equllant amount on retirement and the assets and firm was retained by the surviving partners.

In view of the above, the Tribunal was of the view that this was a clear cut case of assessee receiving a sum of money on retirement from the firm. The Tribunal pointed out that whether, such sum receipt on retirement is taxable or not was answered by Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Riyaz A. Sheikh. In the said judgment, the Bombay High Court had observed that its decision in the case of Prashant S. Joshi placed reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT V/s. R. Lingamallu Rajkumar wherein it had been held that amounts received on retirement by a partner is not subject to capital gains tax.

Held:
It was held that the retirement funds received were not subject to tax and not in the nature of goodwill also.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

FDCM invites application for empanelment of practising CAs/ Chartered Accountant Firms

Invitation For Empanelment Of Practising Chartered Accountants / Chartered Accountant Firms Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM Limited), Nagpur,…

2 days ago
  • Empanelment

PGRI invites application for CAs for empanelment for Circulation Verification work

Press Registrar General of India (PGRI) invites application for empanelment of Chartered Accountants. The Press Registrar General of India manages…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies revised Form for registration as valuer & authorised income tax practitioner

CBDT notifies revised Form No. 169 for making application for registration as a valuer under section 514 and authorised income…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from 30 days prejudiced assessee’s right – HC

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from statutorily available 30 days to 15 days seriously prejudiced assessee’s…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

For registration u/s 12AB, applicability of proviso to section 2(15) can’t be adjudicated

At the stage of registration u/s 12AB, the CIT(E) not empowered to adjudicate applicability of provisio to section 2(15) of…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Flower bed area not included in “built up area” to calculate eligible limit u/s 80IB(10)

Flower bed area could not be included in the definition of “built up area” to calculate eligible limit of 1000…

5 days ago