Revised guidelines for stay of demand at first appeal stage. Minimum deposit amount for grant of stay increased to 20% of the disputed amount from existing 15%
F. No. 404/72/93-ITCC
(FTS:284146)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board ofDirect Taxes
New Delhi, 31st July, 2017
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Reference: Board’s O.M. of even number dated 29.2.2016
Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.3.1996 contains guidelines issued by the Board regarding procedure to be followed for recovery of outstanding demand, including procedure for grant of stay of demand.
Vide O.M. N0.404/72/93-ITCC dated 29.2.2016 revised guidelines were issued in partial modification of lnstruction No 1914, wherein. inter alia, vide para 4(A) it had been laid down that in a case where the outstanding demand is disputed before CIT(A), the Assessing Officer shall grant stay of demand till disposal of first appeal on payment of 15% of the disputed demand unless the case falls in the category discussed in para (B) thereunder.Similar references to the standard rate of 15% have also been made in succeedmg paragraphs therein.
2. The matter has been reviewed by the Board in the light of feedback received from field authorities. In view of the Board’s efforts to contain over pitched assessments through several measures resulting in fairer and more reasonable assessment orders, the standard rate of 15% of the disputed demand is found to be on the lower side. Accordingly. it bas been decided that the standard rate prescribed in O.M. dated 29.2.2016 be revised to 20% of the disputed demand, where the demand is contested before CIT(A). Thus all references to 15% of the disputed demand in the aforesaid O.M dated 29.2.2016 hereby stand modified to 20% of the disputed demand. Other guidelines contained in the O.M. dated 29.2.2016 shall remain unchanged.
These modifications may be immediately brought to the nottce of all officers working in your jurisdiction for proper compliance.
(A.K. Sinha)
Director (ITCC)
23092939
All Pr. Chief Commissioners/Pr. Directors General of Income Tax/Chief Commissioners/ Diredors General of Income Tax
Copy to:
Credit in assessee’s capital account consequent to book entry adjustments in the books of the partnership firm can not be…
Non-compliance of summons issued u/s 131 by investing companies is no ground to make addition under section 68 of the…
Assessee not obliged to demonstrate actual utilization of donation u/s 35(1)(ii) for scientific research made to an eligible institution In…
Phrase "genuineness of activities" has been interpreted liberally by various judicial forums including the ITAT and High Courts - ITAT…
If assessing officer rejects a reply, he had to offer an opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee– Allahabad High…
Business decisions such as withdrawal and redeposit of cash fall within the domain of commercial expediency and AO cannot substitute…