Income Tax

Salary recovered for notice period not taxable u/s 16 – ITAT

Salary recovered for notice period not taxable salary us 16 as per agreement with the employers when actually assessee had received less salary – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 1219 (2017) (04) ITAT

The Grievance:
The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer (AO) holding that the amount received as Notice Pay is liable to be taxed under the head “Salary” u/s 16 of the Income tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). 

Assessment Year : 2010-11
Date/Month of Pronouncement: April, 2017

Brief Facts of the Case:
The assessee is an individual, deriving income from salary, house property and other sources. The case of the assessee was reopened by issuing notice under Section 148 of the Act the ground that the assessee had not disclosed the salary received from his previous two employers. During the course of reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had worked with three employer out of which the assessee had only shown the salary income received from one employer after claiming deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Act. Since the assessee was failed to disclose the salary income from other two employers, the undisclosed salary income were added to the total income of the assessee vide order passed under Section 143(3) r.w. 147 of the Act.

Aggrieved by the order of the ld. Assessing Officer, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) who sustained the additions made by the Assessing Officer.

Observations made by the Tribunal:
The Tribunal observed that find that during the year under consideration the assessee served with first employer and the second employer for few days/months  and out of the salary received, major sum was recovered as notice pay as per agreement with the employers. Therefore, total notice pay was claimed in the return of income as deduction which was recovered from the salary by assessee’s previous employers.

The ITAT observed that the employers had made deduction from the salary which was paid to the assessee during the year under consideration because of leaving the services as per agreement made by the assessee and the respective employer.

According to the Tribunal this was a case of recovery of the salary which is already made to the assessee for which Section 16 of the Act could not be referred. The assessee had actually received the salary from his previous employers after deducting the notice period as per the job agreement with them. Therefore, the actual salary received by the assessee was only taxable.

Held:
ITAT allowed this ground of appeal of the assessee. 

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

Empanelment of ICAI Exam observer for January 2027 Examinations. Last date: 20.11.2026

Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…

10 hours ago
  • GST

No arrest under GST- Major decision of 57th Meeting of GST Council held on 8th October 2026

No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

5 days ago