Income Tax

Section 40A(3) applicable to expenses made in cash not to the payment of advances-ITAT

Section 40A(3) applicable only when payment of expenses is made in cash exceeding specified sum and not to the payment of advances-ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2434 (2018) 07 ITAT

The Appellant assessee had filed the present appeal against the order passed by CIT(A) inter alia in confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of violation of the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The assessee was an individual and engaged in the business of commission agent, servicing, trading & travel agency. During the course of assessment proceedings the AO found that the assessee had made payments without deducting TDS and as such disallowed amount by invoking the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act.

The CIT-A did not consider this submission of assessee and confirmed the addition made by the AO.

The Tribunal observed that the assessee had made submissions that he made an advance payment to the party for conducting tours abroad on behalf of assessee, which were released by phase by phase on four occasion on different dates to the said entity. However, the allegation was that the payments made in cash exceeding the monetary limit prescribed u/s. 40A(3).

The Tribunal opined that the provisions of section 40A(3) are applicable only when payment of expenses is made in cash in the sum exceeding specified amount and not to the payment of advances. Therefore, that addition made u/s 40A(3) was totally unwarranted.

The addition as accordingly deleted.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago