Income Tax

Shri PC Mody takes over as the new Chairman of CBDT

Shri PC Mody takes over as the new Chairman of CBDT

F.No.A.12026/4/2018-Ad.I
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
***

New Delhi, the 15th February, 2019.

OFFICE ORDER No. 38/2019

The President of India is pleased to appoint Shri Pramod Chandra Mody, IRS (IT:82004), presently working as Member, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) as Chairman, Central Board of the Direct Taxes (CBDT) in the Department of Revenue, vice Shri Sushil Chandra, IRS (IT), in Level 17 of Pay Matrix Rs, 2,25,000/-, with the status of Special Secretary to the Government of India from the date of his taking charge of the post, until further orders or his superannuation) whichever is earlier.

(Rajinder Kumar)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India

Copy to:
1. Shri Sushil Chandra, Chairman, CBDT
2. Shri Pramod Chandra Mody, IRS (IT:82004) Member, CBDT
3. PS to FM/PS to MOS(Rev.)/ PPS to Revenue Secretary /SS(Rev.)/ Chairman, CBIC/All Members, CBDT& CBIC/ DO, eEIB/ JS(R)/ JS(Admn.CBDT)
4. DS(Admn)/DS(Pers.)/DS(Ad.VI)/US(GAR)/US(Ad.VI)/ US(Ad.IA&B)
5. Joint Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat for information.
6. PPS to Shri Pradip Kumar Tripathi, Secretary, ACe & EO(DoP&T)
w.r.t. communication No. 18/60/20 16-EO(SM.II) dated 14.02.2019.
7. NIC, Department of Revenue with the request to updated the website of Department.
8. All, Officers and sections reporting to CBDT
9. Chief Supervisor/Reception Officer(Gate No. 2&9)
10. Office Order folder/Spare copies… 10.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

7 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago