Income Tax

Re-assessment of Sonia/Rahul Gandhi to be completed within limitation period – Supreme Court

Re-assessment of Sonia/Rahul Gandhi in connection with Young Indian share allotment to be completed within limitation period but order not to be given effect till next hearing – Supreme Court.

The Division Bench has adjourned the hearing to 08.01.2019 as the as the Bench was not sitting in the afternoon session. 

The Apex Court stated that since the limitation period for completing the assessment is expiring, in the meantime, it would be open to the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment and pass the assessment order as well. However, it was directed that till the next date of hearing, the Re-assessment so made would not be given effect by the Department.

The Supreme Court clarified that the aforesaid course of action is adopted without going into the merits of the case in view of the fact that the matter is still at the preliminary stage and limitation is expiring, 

Earlier, in last month, the Court had agreed to examine the SLP filed by the Congress leaders including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Oscar Fernandes, in the re-opening of their income tax cases for not disclosing Young Indian share allotment.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court had agreed to hear the case on 4th December to decide on the legality of the income tax notice issued under section 148.

The Delhi High Court had dismissed their writ petitions against issue of re-assessment notice u/s 148 of the Income tax Act, 1961.

Senior Lawyers and congressmen,  P Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal argued that mere transfer/ allotment of shares per se did not and could not have led to a taxing event and therefore it can’t be treated as income. 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago