Income Tax

Re-assessment of Sonia/Rahul Gandhi to be completed within limitation period – Supreme Court

Re-assessment of Sonia/Rahul Gandhi in connection with Young Indian share allotment to be completed within limitation period but order not to be given effect till next hearing – Supreme Court.

The Division Bench has adjourned the hearing to 08.01.2019 as the as the Bench was not sitting in the afternoon session. 

The Apex Court stated that since the limitation period for completing the assessment is expiring, in the meantime, it would be open to the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment and pass the assessment order as well. However, it was directed that till the next date of hearing, the Re-assessment so made would not be given effect by the Department.

The Supreme Court clarified that the aforesaid course of action is adopted without going into the merits of the case in view of the fact that the matter is still at the preliminary stage and limitation is expiring, 

Earlier, in last month, the Court had agreed to examine the SLP filed by the Congress leaders including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Oscar Fernandes, in the re-opening of their income tax cases for not disclosing Young Indian share allotment.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court had agreed to hear the case on 4th December to decide on the legality of the income tax notice issued under section 148.

The Delhi High Court had dismissed their writ petitions against issue of re-assessment notice u/s 148 of the Income tax Act, 1961.

Senior Lawyers and congressmen,  P Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal argued that mere transfer/ allotment of shares per se did not and could not have led to a taxing event and therefore it can’t be treated as income. 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash payment for purchase of land or property not violation of 269SS or 269T

Cash payment for purchase of land or property cannot be treated as violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Excel Utility for ITR-1 and ITR-4 available for e-filing for AY 2026-27

Income Tax Department has released excel Utility for e-filing ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27 Excel utilities of ITR-1 and…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Mediclaim amount not deductible from MACT award under medical expenses – SC

Amount of money received as Mediclaim not deductible from an award passed by MACT under the head of medical expenses.…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT jurisdiction is decided by location of AO passing the impugned order

Location of the assessing officer who passed the order shall decide the jurisdiction of the Bench of the Tribunal In…

5 days ago