Income Tax

Re-assessment of Sonia/Rahul Gandhi to be completed within limitation period – Supreme Court

Re-assessment of Sonia/Rahul Gandhi in connection with Young Indian share allotment to be completed within limitation period but order not to be given effect till next hearing – Supreme Court.

The Division Bench has adjourned the hearing to 08.01.2019 as the as the Bench was not sitting in the afternoon session. 

The Apex Court stated that since the limitation period for completing the assessment is expiring, in the meantime, it would be open to the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment and pass the assessment order as well. However, it was directed that till the next date of hearing, the Re-assessment so made would not be given effect by the Department.

The Supreme Court clarified that the aforesaid course of action is adopted without going into the merits of the case in view of the fact that the matter is still at the preliminary stage and limitation is expiring, 

Earlier, in last month, the Court had agreed to examine the SLP filed by the Congress leaders including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Oscar Fernandes, in the re-opening of their income tax cases for not disclosing Young Indian share allotment.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court had agreed to hear the case on 4th December to decide on the legality of the income tax notice issued under section 148.

The Delhi High Court had dismissed their writ petitions against issue of re-assessment notice u/s 148 of the Income tax Act, 1961.

Senior Lawyers and congressmen,  P Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal argued that mere transfer/ allotment of shares per se did not and could not have led to a taxing event and therefore it can’t be treated as income. 

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

3 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

3 days ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

4 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

5 days ago