Income Tax

Re-assessment of Sonia/Rahul Gandhi to be completed within limitation period – Supreme Court

Re-assessment of Sonia/Rahul Gandhi in connection with Young Indian share allotment to be completed within limitation period but order not to be given effect till next hearing – Supreme Court.

The Division Bench has adjourned the hearing to 08.01.2019 as the as the Bench was not sitting in the afternoon session. 

The Apex Court stated that since the limitation period for completing the assessment is expiring, in the meantime, it would be open to the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment and pass the assessment order as well. However, it was directed that till the next date of hearing, the Re-assessment so made would not be given effect by the Department.

The Supreme Court clarified that the aforesaid course of action is adopted without going into the merits of the case in view of the fact that the matter is still at the preliminary stage and limitation is expiring, 

Earlier, in last month, the Court had agreed to examine the SLP filed by the Congress leaders including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Oscar Fernandes, in the re-opening of their income tax cases for not disclosing Young Indian share allotment.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court had agreed to hear the case on 4th December to decide on the legality of the income tax notice issued under section 148.

The Delhi High Court had dismissed their writ petitions against issue of re-assessment notice u/s 148 of the Income tax Act, 1961.

Senior Lawyers and congressmen,  P Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal argued that mere transfer/ allotment of shares per se did not and could not have led to a taxing event and therefore it can’t be treated as income. 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

58 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago