Income Tax

System error showing agricultural income in ITR to AO. Addition made deleted by ITAT as in ITR downloaded such income was NIL

System error showing agricultural income in return to AO. Addition made deleted by the ITAT as in the ITR downloaded such income  was NIL

 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 1158 (2017) (03) ITAT

Assessment Year : 2011-12

Brief Facts of the Case:
The assessee filed her return of income showing tuition fees. The assessment was completed by the AO after making few additions which included inter alia, addition made on the ground that the assessee did not furnish any documentary proof of earning agricultural income.  CIT(A) sustained the same.

Observations made by the Tribunal:
The Tribunal observed that in the assessment order the AO had recorded that Part B-T1 (Computation of total income) of the return filed by the assessee indicated that she had shown agricultural income. However when called upon to furnish the details of earning such agricultural income, the assessee submitted that no agricultural income was shown by her in the return. Even a copy of the return filed by the assessee was filed in which there was no mention of any agricultural income.

The assessee categorically stated that there was some system error in the noting by the AO about the assessee disclosing any agricultural income. The assessee’s claim ab initio was that no agricultural income was earned or declared by her.

It was noted that as per copy of the return downloaded from the system. Part B-T1 (Computation of total income) under Column 13 ‘Net agricultural income’ showed figure of ‘0’.

The ITAT opined that it was vivid that the assessee was rightly contending before the AO that she had not earned any agricultural income and there was some system error. Also the assessee argued that the assessee had never declared any agricultural income in the preceding or succeeding years and it was uncontroverted on behalf of the Revenue.

The Tribunal drew the inference that the assessee did not indicate any agricultural income which could have been separately added to the total income

Held:
This addition was deleted.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • RBI

RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to banks

RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to bank RBI has issued RBI Credit Risk Management Directions, 2025 defining ‘Related Party’…

1 day ago
  • GST

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025 Dear Taxpayers, The relevant declarations issued vide Notification No. 05/2025 –…

2 days ago
  • GST

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at threshold

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

6 days ago