Income Tax

System error showing agricultural income in ITR to AO. Addition made deleted by ITAT as in ITR downloaded such income was NIL

System error showing agricultural income in return to AO. Addition made deleted by the ITAT as in the ITR downloaded such income  was NIL

 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 1158 (2017) (03) ITAT

Assessment Year : 2011-12

Brief Facts of the Case:
The assessee filed her return of income showing tuition fees. The assessment was completed by the AO after making few additions which included inter alia, addition made on the ground that the assessee did not furnish any documentary proof of earning agricultural income.  CIT(A) sustained the same.

Observations made by the Tribunal:
The Tribunal observed that in the assessment order the AO had recorded that Part B-T1 (Computation of total income) of the return filed by the assessee indicated that she had shown agricultural income. However when called upon to furnish the details of earning such agricultural income, the assessee submitted that no agricultural income was shown by her in the return. Even a copy of the return filed by the assessee was filed in which there was no mention of any agricultural income.

The assessee categorically stated that there was some system error in the noting by the AO about the assessee disclosing any agricultural income. The assessee’s claim ab initio was that no agricultural income was earned or declared by her.

It was noted that as per copy of the return downloaded from the system. Part B-T1 (Computation of total income) under Column 13 ‘Net agricultural income’ showed figure of ‘0’.

The ITAT opined that it was vivid that the assessee was rightly contending before the AO that she had not earned any agricultural income and there was some system error. Also the assessee argued that the assessee had never declared any agricultural income in the preceding or succeeding years and it was uncontroverted on behalf of the Revenue.

The Tribunal drew the inference that the assessee did not indicate any agricultural income which could have been separately added to the total income

Held:
This addition was deleted.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Effect on a common taxpayer of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits Income Tax Department has…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Accounting principles and provisions of law do not permit addition of opening balance – ITAT

Accounting principles and provisions of law do not permit the addition in relation to an opening balance - ITAT In…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty for late supply of goods allowable deduction u/s 37 being not a crime or prohibited activity

Penalty levied for late supply of goods is an allowable deduction u/s 37 as late supply neither a crime nor…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest received from Cooperative banks allowable deduction u/s 80P to a Cooperative Society

Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) towards interest received from cooperative banks is allowable to a cooperative society. In a recent judgment, Hon'ble…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC to decide distinction in employees & employer contribution to PF, ESI for allowability u/s 43B

Supreme Court to decide difference between employees & employer contribution to PF, ESI for allowability under Section 43B of the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No liability to collect TCS u/s 206C (1C) from person involved in illegal mining – SC

There is no legislative mandate to collect tax at source under section 206C (1C) from the person involved in illegal…

2 days ago