Income Tax

TDS Default-Assessee liable us 2011A for interest even if payee declared income and paid taxes. ITAT amends order in line with Supreme Court judgment

TDS Default-Assessee liable us 2011A for interest even if payee declared income and paid taxes. ITAT amends the order in line with Supreme Court judgment.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
943 2016 (06) ITAT

Date of Judgment/Order June 2016

Brief Facts of the Case:
A TDS survey was conducted in the premises of the assessee and it was found that TDS was not deducted on contract payment, rent and on professional charges and the TDS assessments were completed accordigly. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A) who held that payments made to advertising agencies were liable to TDS and directed the A.O. to compute the TDS liability if the amount exceeds the threshold limit for that particular assessment year. Aggrieved by the decision of the CIT(A), the assessee preferred appeals before the ITAT. The ITAT  by order dated 18-09-2014 remitted the matter to the AO with direction to verify as to whether the payee has declared the respective income and paid tax thereon and if so, the assessee shall not be held as ‘the assessee in default’ for the purpose of invoking provisions of section 201 and 201A. 

The appeal in the subject, has been preferred by the Revenue pointing out that the observation of Tribunal directing the AO not to treat the assessee in default for the purpose of section 201(1A), if the payee has declared the respective income, is not in line with the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd., vs. CIT (2007) 293 ITR 226 (SC). 

The ITAT observed that a mistake had occurred in the order of Tribunal dated 18.09.2014 in and replaced the para no. 13 of the judgment.

Extract from ITAT Judgment:

……… we replace para No.13 which shall read as follows :

13. Hence, we remit the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify as to whether the payee has declared the respective income and paid tax thereon and if so, the assessee shall not be held as “the assessee in default” for the purpose of invoking provisions of section 201(1). However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) of the Act till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee. Further, from the details at para 6.3 produced at page 6 of the CIT(A) order, we find from the payments made towards advertisement the following do not exceed Rs.20,000.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Assessee eligible for Chapter VIA deduction u/s 80IE on increased income due to disallownces

Assessee is eligible for claiming deduction under Chapter VIA under Section 80IE of the Income Tax Act 1961 on the…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee filing ITR under presumptive tax can’t be faulted for not giving details not mandated

Assessee could not be faulted for showing only cash in hand and bank balance as capital following presumptive taxation when…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Sale of flats in a real estate project held capital gains considering intention of assessee

Sale of flats in a real estate project held capital gains as intention of the assesee was to hold that…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest liability recognised by journal entries at the close of year, can’t be termed as fictitious – ITAT

Merely because interest liability was recognised by journal entries at the close of the year, it does not make expenditure…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposits in bank which were immediately transferred to other accounts – addition deleted

Addition for cash deposits in bank account which were immediately transferred to other accounts deleted in absence any enquiry by…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases being appropriate

ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases as purchases from unregistered dealers could not be ruled out. In a recent…

3 days ago