Income Tax

TDS Default-Assessee liable us 2011A for interest even if payee declared income and paid taxes. ITAT amends order in line with Supreme Court judgment

TDS Default-Assessee liable us 2011A for interest even if payee declared income and paid taxes. ITAT amends the order in line with Supreme Court judgment.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
943 2016 (06) ITAT

Date of Judgment/Order June 2016

Brief Facts of the Case:
A TDS survey was conducted in the premises of the assessee and it was found that TDS was not deducted on contract payment, rent and on professional charges and the TDS assessments were completed accordigly. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A) who held that payments made to advertising agencies were liable to TDS and directed the A.O. to compute the TDS liability if the amount exceeds the threshold limit for that particular assessment year. Aggrieved by the decision of the CIT(A), the assessee preferred appeals before the ITAT. The ITAT  by order dated 18-09-2014 remitted the matter to the AO with direction to verify as to whether the payee has declared the respective income and paid tax thereon and if so, the assessee shall not be held as ‘the assessee in default’ for the purpose of invoking provisions of section 201 and 201A. 

The appeal in the subject, has been preferred by the Revenue pointing out that the observation of Tribunal directing the AO not to treat the assessee in default for the purpose of section 201(1A), if the payee has declared the respective income, is not in line with the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd., vs. CIT (2007) 293 ITR 226 (SC). 

The ITAT observed that a mistake had occurred in the order of Tribunal dated 18.09.2014 in and replaced the para no. 13 of the judgment.

Extract from ITAT Judgment:

……… we replace para No.13 which shall read as follows :

13. Hence, we remit the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify as to whether the payee has declared the respective income and paid tax thereon and if so, the assessee shall not be held as “the assessee in default” for the purpose of invoking provisions of section 201(1). However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) of the Act till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee. Further, from the details at para 6.3 produced at page 6 of the CIT(A) order, we find from the payments made towards advertisement the following do not exceed Rs.20,000.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • RBI

RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to banks

RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to bank RBI has issued RBI Credit Risk Management Directions, 2025 defining ‘Related Party’…

11 hours ago
  • GST

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025 Dear Taxpayers, The relevant declarations issued vide Notification No. 05/2025 –…

2 days ago
  • GST

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at threshold

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

5 days ago