Income Tax

TDS provisions not applicable on internet leaseline charges u/s 194-I 194C or 194J of Income Tax Act

TDS provisions not applicable on internet leaseline charges u/s 194-I 194C or 194J of Income Tax Act as assessee only availed internet connection and was not using any asset, plant or machinery which involved payment of rent.

 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2052 (2017) (08) ITAT

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:
Sktcekk Communication Ltd V/s DCIT (2001) 251 ITR 53) Madras High Court
Wipro Ltd V/s ITO (2004) 80 TTJ 191)
CIT V/s Bharti Cellur Lte
CIT V/s Escotel Mobile Communication Limited
CIT V/s Hutchinson Essar Tel Ltd (2008) (Del)

Brief Facts of the Case:

During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO observed that the assessee had paid lease line charges and internet charges on which according to AO TDS u/s 194-I of the Act had not been deducted.

Accordingly, the AO (TDS) issued notice to the assessee which was replied by the assessee by submitting that the payment to the above said company was for the internet connection and not for use of any plant or equipments and therefore the provisions qua TDS were not applicable either u/s 194-C or 194-I or 194-J of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The AO, did not find the reply of the assessee convincing and raised demand of tax and interest thereon by treating the assessee in default.

In the appellate proceedings, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee by holding that the provisions of TDS u/s 194I of the Act were applicable on the leaseline/internet charges.

Observations made by the Tribunal:

The Tribunal found that the assessee had availed internet services and paid internet /lease charges for the same.

It was observed that the assessee had only availed the internet connection and was not using any asset, plant or machinery which involved payment of rent.

Held:
The leaseline charges/internet charges paid were only for use of internet connection and do not fall within the provisions of section 194-I ,194-C and 194-J of the Act.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Release of seized assets if mandatory on completion of 120 days? Question referred to Larger Bench

Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…

12 hours ago
  • Uncategorized

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31/10/2026

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31st October 2026 Taking into account…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Earlier acceptance is relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation of fictitious investment

Earlier acceptance of investment is a relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation that investments were fictitious from inception – High…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

A bald statement recorded during survey can not be basis for any addition

A bald statement recorded during survey would not in itself be a foundation for any addition - ITAT In a…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

ICAI issued Guidelines for responding to Tenders by Chartered Accountants

ICAI issued Guidelines for responding to Tenders by Chartered Accountants The ICAI has issued Tender guidelines to Chartered Accountants for…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

Empanelment of ICAI Exam observer for January 2027 Examinations. Last date: 20.11.2026

Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…

5 days ago