Income Tax

TDS 194C not applicable on payment by contractee to contractor. Supreme Court dismisses SLP of Income Tax Department

TDS 194C not applicable on payment by contractee to contractor of license fee. Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Income Tax Department

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2444 (2018) 07 SC

The respondent assessee was granted a contract by IRCTC for providing catering service for which the assessee was required to make payment of licence fee. The Assessing officer disallowed the payment u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) as the assessee had not deducted tax at source.

CUT(A) confirmed the disallowance. However, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal /ITAT) allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the disallowance.

Aggrieved, the Income Tax Department (Revenue) challenged the order of the Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that Section 194J of the Act raises the requirement for deduction of tax on payment of professional or technical service fee and for obvious reasons therefore the section had no applicability.

Further, it was observed that section 194C requires deduction of tax at source on payments to contractors. Under sub section (1) of Section 194C, any person responsible for paying any sum to any resident for carrying out any work in pursuance of a contract between the contractor and the specified person is required at the time of credit of such sum in the account of the contractor or at the time of payment to deduct tax at specified rate.

The Hon’ble High Court concurred with the Tribunal in observing that section 194C of the Act would apply in case of a payment being made by a contractor to a contractee and not vice-versa. In the present case, the payment of licence fee was made by the contractee to the contractor and therefore section 194C of the Act would not apply.

Aggrieved by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court, the Revenue had filed a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

However, their Lordships dismissed the SLP of the Revenue on the ground of delay as well as on merits.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash payment for purchase of land or property not violation of 269SS or 269T

Cash payment for purchase of land or property cannot be treated as violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Excel Utility for ITR-1 and ITR-4 available for e-filing for AY 2026-27

Income Tax Department has released excel Utility for e-filing ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27 Excel utilities of ITR-1 and…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Mediclaim amount not deductible from MACT award under medical expenses – SC

Amount of money received as Mediclaim not deductible from an award passed by MACT under the head of medical expenses.…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT jurisdiction is decided by location of AO passing the impugned order

Location of the assessing officer who passed the order shall decide the jurisdiction of the Bench of the Tribunal In…

5 days ago