Supreme Court

SC stays order to place security guards at all ATMs 24×7. The Gauhati High Court in suo motu PIL had issued directions preventing ATM frauds

SC stays order to place security guards at all ATMs 24×7. The Gauhati High Court in suo motu PIL had issued directions for preventing ATM frauds.

The Apex Court yesterday stayed the order of the Gauhati High Court directing all banks to deploy security guards at all ATMs 24×7 round the clock..

The Court pronounced the order in response to SLP filed by the State Bank of India. The Court stayed only the direction to place security guards round the clock at all ATMS. Other directions of the order of the Guahati High Court continue to operate. In fact due to the ill managed demonetisation scheme, the remaining directions of the Guahati High Court become much more relevant than before.

Read the SC Order 

Earlierthe Gauhati High Court taking cognizance of a news item published in the Assam Tribune Daily on 14.12.2012 related to ATM fraud initiated a suo motu action exercising its PIL jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Subsequently, notices were issued to the State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Guwahati, Reserve Bank of India, Union of India, Ministry of Finance and Director General of Police, Assam with a view to decide as to what safeguard can be provided to the customers of ATM to avoid recurrence of frauds in future when they go to operate their accounts for withdrawing money from ATM. 

The following directions were issued to the State authorities to ensure implementation of the following plan suggested by the State Government, Assam:

(a)   To adopt security protocols for proper functioning of ATMS.  Security Protocols include –

(i)  Place security guards round the clock at all ATMs so that proper queues are enforced and to ensure that only one customer can enter for one ATM, at a time.

(ii)  To ensure CCTVs are functioning round the clock and some alarm system can be put to indicate if CC Cameras are non functional.

(iii) Entry in ATM chamber with helmets, mufflers, caps etc. with a view to conceal one’s identity should be prohibited by the security guard on duty.

(iv) Check the character & antecedents of temporary workers, canteen employees etc. in the banks.

(b)  To designate Nodal Officers by each Bank for liaisoning with Police and for providing video footage and other information that may be sought by a Police investigator during investigation of ATM related thefts etc.  A lot of time was wasted by Police for collecting information, video footage etc. from Banks.

(c)  To educate public for safe and secure electronic transactions.

(d) Many cases were reported where public had shared their PIN No. with unknown callers leading to siphoning of funds from their accounts. The Banks should write to this warning in ATM chambers.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

18 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago