Supreme Court

SC stays order to place security guards at all ATMs 24×7. The Gauhati High Court in suo motu PIL had issued directions preventing ATM frauds

SC stays order to place security guards at all ATMs 24×7. The Gauhati High Court in suo motu PIL had issued directions for preventing ATM frauds.

The Apex Court yesterday stayed the order of the Gauhati High Court directing all banks to deploy security guards at all ATMs 24×7 round the clock..

The Court pronounced the order in response to SLP filed by the State Bank of India. The Court stayed only the direction to place security guards round the clock at all ATMS. Other directions of the order of the Guahati High Court continue to operate. In fact due to the ill managed demonetisation scheme, the remaining directions of the Guahati High Court become much more relevant than before.

Read the SC Order 

Earlierthe Gauhati High Court taking cognizance of a news item published in the Assam Tribune Daily on 14.12.2012 related to ATM fraud initiated a suo motu action exercising its PIL jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Subsequently, notices were issued to the State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Guwahati, Reserve Bank of India, Union of India, Ministry of Finance and Director General of Police, Assam with a view to decide as to what safeguard can be provided to the customers of ATM to avoid recurrence of frauds in future when they go to operate their accounts for withdrawing money from ATM. 

The following directions were issued to the State authorities to ensure implementation of the following plan suggested by the State Government, Assam:

(a)   To adopt security protocols for proper functioning of ATMS.  Security Protocols include –

(i)  Place security guards round the clock at all ATMs so that proper queues are enforced and to ensure that only one customer can enter for one ATM, at a time.

(ii)  To ensure CCTVs are functioning round the clock and some alarm system can be put to indicate if CC Cameras are non functional.

(iii) Entry in ATM chamber with helmets, mufflers, caps etc. with a view to conceal one’s identity should be prohibited by the security guard on duty.

(iv) Check the character & antecedents of temporary workers, canteen employees etc. in the banks.

(b)  To designate Nodal Officers by each Bank for liaisoning with Police and for providing video footage and other information that may be sought by a Police investigator during investigation of ATM related thefts etc.  A lot of time was wasted by Police for collecting information, video footage etc. from Banks.

(c)  To educate public for safe and secure electronic transactions.

(d) Many cases were reported where public had shared their PIN No. with unknown callers leading to siphoning of funds from their accounts. The Banks should write to this warning in ATM chambers.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No second reopening for unexplained credits in bank due to bank’s name change

Information of deposits in bank did not constitute fresh information necessitating second reopening due to change in bank name In…

8 hours ago
  • Empanelment

FDCM invites application for empanelment of practising CAs/ Chartered Accountant Firms

Invitation For Empanelment Of Practising Chartered Accountants / Chartered Accountant Firms Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM Limited), Nagpur,…

5 days ago
  • Empanelment

PGRI invites application for CAs for empanelment for Circulation Verification work

Press Registrar General of India (PGRI) invites application for empanelment of Chartered Accountants. The Press Registrar General of India manages…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies revised Form for registration as valuer & authorised income tax practitioner

CBDT notifies revised Form No. 169 for making application for registration as a valuer under section 514 and authorised income…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from 30 days prejudiced assessee’s right – HC

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from statutorily available 30 days to 15 days seriously prejudiced assessee’s…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For registration u/s 12AB, applicability of proviso to section 2(15) can’t be adjudicated

At the stage of registration u/s 12AB, the CIT(E) not empowered to adjudicate applicability of provisio to section 2(15) of…

7 days ago