RBI

RBI issues regulations for NBFCs under amended Factoring Regulation Act 2011

RBI issues regulations for NBFCs under amended Factoring Regulation Act 2011

The Factoring Regulation Act, 2011 has been amended recently. The amendment widens the scope of companies that can undertake factoring business. The said Act permits Trade Receivables Discounting System (TReDS) to file the particulars of assignment of receivables transactions with the Central Registry on behalf of the Factors for operational efficiency.

The Act empowers the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to make regulations prescribing the manner of grant of certificate of registration and for prescribing the manner of filing of assignment of receivables transactions by TReDS on behalf of the Factors.

In exercise of the powers conferred under the Act, the RBI has issued the following regulations:

  1. Registration of Factors (Reserve Bank) Regulations, 2022 issued vide Notification No. DOR.FIN.080/CGM(JPS) – 2022 dated January 14, 2022 

  2. Registration of Assignment of Receivables (Reserve Bank) Regulations, 2022 issued vide Notification No. DOR.FIN.081/CGM(JPS) – 2022 dated January 14, 2022 (

Under the provisions of the regulations mentioned above, all existing non-deposit taking NBFC-Investment and Credit Companies (NBFC-ICCs) with asset size of ₹1,000 crore & above will be permitted to undertake factoring business subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. This will increase the number of NBFCs eligible to undertake factoring business significantly from 7 to 182.

Other NBFC-ICCs can also undertake factoring business by registering as NBFC-Factor. Eligible companies may apply to the Reserve Bank for seeking registration under the Act. Further, in respect of trade receivables financed through a Trade Receivables Discounting System (TReDS), the particulars of assignment of receivables shall be filed with the Central Registry on behalf of the Factors by the TReDS concerned within 10 days.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Mentioning wrong place of delivery in e-way bill was human error – High Court

In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court has quashed the penalty order u/s 129 of UPGST Act 2017…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased prior to 2001- Clarification

CBDT has clarified the question as to what would be the Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased…

1 day ago
  • GST

Advisory for FORM GSTR-1A for furnishing details of outward supplies

Advisory for FORM GSTR-1A- Form and manner of furnishing details of outward supplies GSTN has issued an advisory for FORM…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No Penalty u/s 271E on cash repayment of advances treated unexplained cash credits

Penalty u/s 271E can not be imposed on cash repayment of advances treated as unexplained cash credits. In a recent…

1 day ago
  • GST

Mining Royalty is not a tax – Supreme Court Nine Judges Bench approves decision in Kesoram

Mining Royalty is not a tax – Supreme Court Nine Judges Bench approves decision In Kesoram Industries and held that…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee has right to get complete statements recorded against him – High Court

Assessee has right to get complete statements recorded against him and relied upon by the Income Tax Department  during the…

2 days ago