Judgments

  • Income Tax

No Penalty for discrepancy in salary figure between Form No. 16 and 26AS

For discrepancy in salary figure between Form No. 16 and 26AS it cannot be said that the assessee has concealed…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

Revised computation of deduction u/s 10A of Income Tax Act allowable-HC

Revised computation of deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 permissible having regard to Section 10A (5) and…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

Acceptance of loans by journal entries not violates section 269SS – SLP dismissed

Acceptance of loans by passing journal entries in books of accounts not in violation of section 269SS hence no penalty u/s 271D imposable – SC dismisses…

6 years ago
  • GST

TCS on motor vehicle not part of value of goods and services – HC admits Petition

TCS on motor vehicle u/s 206C(1F) of the Income Tax Act not integral part of the value of the goods…

6 years ago
  • GST

HC strucks down GST Circular proposing tax on DISCOM on bundled services

High Court struck down GST Circular proposing levy of GST on DISCOM for various other bundled services connected with the…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposed by CIT without recording satisfaction in order u/s 263 invalid

No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed by CIT without recording satisfaction in revision order 263.  Provision of Section 271(1B)…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty SCN not striking off relevant limb upheld when later notices not challenged

Validity of Penalty notice non striking off relevant limb u/s 271(1)(c) upheld when subsequent opportunity notices sent by AO were…

6 years ago
  • GST

Service Tax Audit prima facie permissible post GST regime-Calcutta HC

Service Tax Audit prima facie permissible post GST regime - Calcutta High Court. Authorities entitled to audit for the period…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

When ITAT quashed revision u/s 263 inspecting records furnished-no interference called

When ITAT inspected documents furnished in response to show-cause notice u/s 263 and found transactions not bogus, no interference was…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

Malba charges rejected as cost of investment for claiming deduction u/s 54F

Malba charges was rejected as cost of investment for claiming deduction u/s 54F as there was no occasion for purchasing…

6 years ago