Companies Act

Govt. constitutes Company Law Committee for making recommendations on Companies Act implementation

Govt. constitutes Company Law Committee for examining and making recommendations on various provisions/issues pertaining to implementation of the Companies Act

Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Government constitutes Company Law Committee for examining and making recommendations on various provisions and issues pertaining to implementation of the Companies Act

18 SEP 2019 7:12PM 

In line with the Government’s objective of promoting Ease of Living in the country by providing Ease of Doing Business to law abiding corporates, fostering improved corporate compliance for stakeholders at large and also to address emerging issues having impact on the working of corporates in the country, it has been decided to constitute a Company Law Committee for examining and making recommendations to the Government on various provisions and issues pertaining to implementation of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008.

The Company Law Committee shall comprise of the following members:-

S. No.

Name of Person/ Institution

   – Position

1.

Secretary, MCA

  • Chairman

2.

Dr. T. K. Viswanathan, Ex- Secretary General, Lok Sabha

  • Member

3.

Shri Uday Kotak, MD, Kotak Mahindra Bank

  • Member

4.

Shri Shardul S Shroff, Executive Chairman, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.

  • Member

5.

Shri Amarjit Chopra, Senior Partner, GSA Associates, New Delhi

  • Member

6.

Shri Rajib Sekhar Sahoo, Principal Partner, SRB & Associates, Chartered Accountants, Bhubaneswar

  • Member

7.

Shri Ajay Bahl, Founder and Managing Partner, AZB & Partners, Advocates & Solicitors

  • Member

8.

Shri G. Ramaswamy, Partner, G. Ramaswamy & Co. Chartered Accountants, Coimbatore

  • Member

9.

Shri Sidharth Birla, Chairman, Xpro India Limited

  • Member

10.

Ms. Preeti Malhotra, Group President, Corporate Affairs & Governance, Smart Group

  • Member

11.

Joint Secretary (Policy)

–  Member Secretary

The terms of reference of the Committee are as follows:-

1. Analyze the nature of the offences (compoundable and non- compoundable) and submit its recommendation as to whether any of the offences could be re-categorized as  ‘civil wrongs’ along with measures to optimize the compliance requirements under the Companies Act, 2013 and concomitant measures to provide further Ease of Doing Business;

2. Examine the feasibility of introducing settlement mechanism, deferred prosecution agreement, etc., within the fold of the Companies Act, 2013;

3. Study the existing framework under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 and suggest measures to plug the gaps, if any, while at the same time enhancing the Ease of Doing Business;

4. Propose measures to further de-clog and improve the functioning of the NCLT;

5. Suggest measures for removing any bottlenecks in the overall functioning of the statutory bodies like SFIO, IEPFA, NFRA, etc. under the Act ;

6. Identify specific provisions under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 which are required to be amended to bring about greater Ease of Living for the corporate stakeholders including but not restricted to review of Forms under the two Acts;

7. Any other relevant recommendation as it may deem necessary.

The Committee shall submit its recommendations in phases and subject-wise to the Government from time to time as may be decided by the Chairperson of the Committee.

The Committee shall initially have a tenure of one year from the date of its first meeting.

Source: PIB Delhi

addition u/s 68 addition u/s 69A ca misconduct cash deposit in bank cbdt circular CBDT Instruction cbdt notification cbdt order cbdt press release cgst circular cgst notification cit revision 263 concealment penalty condonation of delay covid-19 custom circular demonetisation due date extension e-way bill faq GST circular GST Council Meeting gst faq gstn advisory GSTR-3B GST rates IBBI ibc income tax prosecution itat mca circular MCA notification order u/s 119 penalty 271(1)(c) penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Press Release reasons recorded reopening 148 Reopening us 147 Search & Seizure sebi circular transfer and postings unexplained cash credits validity of notice u/s 148 Withdrawal of 2000 500 Bank Notes

Share

Recent Posts

  • CA CS CMA

CA accused of forgery by advising investment in a firm gets bail by Allahabad High Court

Chartered Accountant accused of forgery and misappropriation of fund by advising investment in a particular firm gets bail  In a…

2 hours ago
  • consumer-protection

Software had nexus with generation of profits, purchaser can’t be said a consumer – SC

Purchase of software had a nexus with generation of profits, therefore purchaser was not a consumer under Consumer Protection Act…

5 hours ago
  • post office

Termination upheld of Postmaster who embezzled money by mere stamping passbooks

Termination upheld of Postmaster who embezzled deposit money by mere stamping passbooks of account holders. In a recent judgment, Hon'ble…

6 hours ago
  • GST

Supreme Court stays DGGI order on the issue of two parallel GST proceedings

Supreme Court stays DGGI order on the issue of bar on two parallel GST proceedings in terms of Section 6(2)(b)…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee can’t be said to indulged in penny stock sale without showing his involvement

Assessee could not said to indulged in penny stock sale on human probabilities without showing his involvement – ITAT deleted…

13 hours ago
  • Excise/Custom

Before staying CESTAT order High Court should have framed substantial questions of law – SC

Before staying CESTAT order the High Court should have framed the substantial questions of law and thereafter could have passed…

1 day ago