Companies Act

Independent directors relatives also should not be indebted /guarantor to company/associates for Rs. 50 Lakhs or more – Notification

Independent directors relatives also should not be indebted /guarantor to company for Rs. 50 Lakhs or more Change in directors appointment Rules

MCA has notified Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Second Amendment Rules, 2018 by making amendment to the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.

The Rule 5 has been has been amended to provide that none of the relatives of an independent director should be indebted to the company or has given a guarantee to its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoter or directors for an amount of Rs. 50 Lakhs at any time during the two immediately preceding financial years or during current financial year.

Also the forwarding of copy of resignation of director to RoC has been made optional.

Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Notification

New Delhi, the 7th  May, 2018

G.S.R. (E). –  In exercise of the  powers conferred  by sections 149 and 168 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Second Amendment Rules, 2018.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their  publication in the official Gazette .

2. In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, rule 5 shall be numbered as sub-rule (1) thereof, and after sub­ rule (1) as so numbered, the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:-

“(2) None of the relatives of an independent director, for the purposes of sub-clauses (ii) and (iii) of clause (d) of sub-section (6) of section 149,-

(i) is indebted to the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoters, or directors; or

(ii) has given a guarantee or provided any security in connection with the indebtedness of any third person to the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoters, or directors of such holding company,

for an amount of fifty lakhs rupees, at any time during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year .” 

3. In the principal rules, in rule 16, for the word “shall”, the word “may” shall be substituted.

[F. No. 1/22/2013-CL.V-Part-III]

Sd/
(K.V.R. Murty)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Note:- The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, section 3, sub-section (i) vide notification number G.S.R. 259(E),  dated the 31st  March,  2014  and subsequently  amended vide the following notifications:-

Serial Number Notification  Number Notification Date
1. G.S.R. 671(E) 18th September, 2014
2. G.S.R. 42(E) 19th January, 2015
3. G.S.R. 839(E) 5th July, 2017
4. G.S.R. 51 (E) 22nd January, 2018.

Download Notification Click Here >>

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago