Companies Act

Independent directors relatives also should not be indebted /guarantor to company/associates for Rs. 50 Lakhs or more – Notification

Independent directors relatives also should not be indebted /guarantor to company for Rs. 50 Lakhs or more Change in directors appointment Rules

MCA has notified Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Second Amendment Rules, 2018 by making amendment to the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.

The Rule 5 has been has been amended to provide that none of the relatives of an independent director should be indebted to the company or has given a guarantee to its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoter or directors for an amount of Rs. 50 Lakhs at any time during the two immediately preceding financial years or during current financial year.

Also the forwarding of copy of resignation of director to RoC has been made optional.

Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Notification

New Delhi, the 7th  May, 2018

G.S.R. (E). –  In exercise of the  powers conferred  by sections 149 and 168 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Second Amendment Rules, 2018.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their  publication in the official Gazette .

2. In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, rule 5 shall be numbered as sub-rule (1) thereof, and after sub­ rule (1) as so numbered, the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:-

“(2) None of the relatives of an independent director, for the purposes of sub-clauses (ii) and (iii) of clause (d) of sub-section (6) of section 149,-

(i) is indebted to the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoters, or directors; or

(ii) has given a guarantee or provided any security in connection with the indebtedness of any third person to the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoters, or directors of such holding company,

for an amount of fifty lakhs rupees, at any time during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year .” 

3. In the principal rules, in rule 16, for the word “shall”, the word “may” shall be substituted.

[F. No. 1/22/2013-CL.V-Part-III]

Sd/
(K.V.R. Murty)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Note:- The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, section 3, sub-section (i) vide notification number G.S.R. 259(E),  dated the 31st  March,  2014  and subsequently  amended vide the following notifications:-

Serial Number Notification  Number Notification Date
1. G.S.R. 671(E) 18th September, 2014
2. G.S.R. 42(E) 19th January, 2015
3. G.S.R. 839(E) 5th July, 2017
4. G.S.R. 51 (E) 22nd January, 2018.

Download Notification Click Here >>

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

2 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

7 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

1 week ago