ICAI

ICAI bans a CA for additional month and withdraws removal of another CA

ICAI bans a CA for additional month and withdraws removal of another CA for alleged misconduct

ICAI had earlier removed the names of these chartered accountants from the Register of Members and had also imposed a fine with condition that in case of default in payment of fine within stipulated time, his name be removed for additional one month period.

Since these CAs had failed to pay the imposed fine within stipulated time, the Disciplinary Committee in terms of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007 and the Chartered Accountants Regulations 1988 has ordered their further removal as under:

Name of CA Period of removal
CA. Muthukumaran Jayaraman (Membership No. 207004) Virugambakkam, CHENNAI  Consolidated period of Thirteen months (one year plus additional one month) with effect from 14th February, 2022

Further in the following cases, the Appellate Authority had set aside the Order of the Disciplinary Committee holding the CA not Guilty of any misconduct. As a result his removal has been restored:

CA. Raj Seckhar M S (Membership No. 200772), Macheri Manor, Coimbatore order for removal of name is withdrawn

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Mentioning wrong place of delivery in e-way bill was human error – High Court

In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court has quashed the penalty order u/s 129 of UPGST Act 2017…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased prior to 2001- Clarification

CBDT has clarified the question as to what would be the Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased…

24 hours ago
  • GST

Advisory for FORM GSTR-1A for furnishing details of outward supplies

Advisory for FORM GSTR-1A- Form and manner of furnishing details of outward supplies GSTN has issued an advisory for FORM…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No Penalty u/s 271E on cash repayment of advances treated unexplained cash credits

Penalty u/s 271E can not be imposed on cash repayment of advances treated as unexplained cash credits. In a recent…

1 day ago
  • GST

Mining Royalty is not a tax – Supreme Court Nine Judges Bench approves decision in Kesoram

Mining Royalty is not a tax – Supreme Court Nine Judges Bench approves decision In Kesoram Industries and held that…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee has right to get complete statements recorded against him – High Court

Assessee has right to get complete statements recorded against him and relied upon by the Income Tax Department  during the…

2 days ago