ICAI

ICAI bans a CA for additional month and withdraws removal of another CA

ICAI bans a CA for additional month and withdraws removal of another CA for alleged misconduct

ICAI had earlier removed the names of these chartered accountants from the Register of Members and had also imposed a fine with condition that in case of default in payment of fine within stipulated time, his name be removed for additional one month period.

Since these CAs had failed to pay the imposed fine within stipulated time, the Disciplinary Committee in terms of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007 and the Chartered Accountants Regulations 1988 has ordered their further removal as under:

Name of CA Period of removal
CA. Muthukumaran Jayaraman (Membership No. 207004) Virugambakkam, CHENNAI  Consolidated period of Thirteen months (one year plus additional one month) with effect from 14th February, 2022

Further in the following cases, the Appellate Authority had set aside the Order of the Disciplinary Committee holding the CA not Guilty of any misconduct. As a result his removal has been restored:

CA. Raj Seckhar M S (Membership No. 200772), Macheri Manor, Coimbatore order for removal of name is withdrawn

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No obligation to deduct TDS u/s 195 on payment to non-resident foreign commission agent

No obligation to deduct tax at source u/s 195 on the commission paid to non-resident foreign commission agent not liable…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80P denied as return not filed u/s 139(1) but in response to notice u/s 148

Deduction u/s 80P denied as assessee did not file return u/s 139(1) but beyond the due date only in response…

1 day ago
  • GST

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation on possibility of misusing the concession of pre arrest…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITR was not non est for no e-verification when AO took cognizance of returned income

Return could not be said to be non est for non e-verification when AO had been taken due cognizance of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Section 43CB & ICDS-III is applicable to contractors not to real estate developers

Section 43CB read with ICDS-III is applicable to contractors and not real estate developers - ITAT In a recent judgment,…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Expenses of ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act.

Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…

3 days ago