Income Tax

Additional Charge in the grade of Pr. CCIT/ CCsIT – CBDT Order

Additional Charge in the grade of Pr. CCIT/ CCsIT – CBDT Order. CCIT, Additional Charge is for Vijayawada, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata

F.No. A-22011/2/2019-Ad.VI
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

OFFICE ORDER NO. 146 OF 2019

North Block, New Delhi The 28th June, 2019

The following officers in the grade of Pr. CCIT/CCsIT are, hereby, ordered to hold the charge(s) as indicated against their names, in addition to their substantive charge/additional charge(s), if any, being held by them, with effect from 01.07.2019 and until further orders: –

S.No.

Civil Code No

Name of the Officer & Designation

Additional Charge
1. 85039

Shri    Chitta    Ranjan    Pati, CCIT,  Vishakhapatnam

CCIT, Vijayawada
2. 85061

Shri  Manik  Lal  Karmakar, CCIT (TDS}, Mumbai

CCIT-11, Mumbai
3. 84001

Shri N. Sankaran ,  Pr. CCIT, Hyderabad

Pr.    CCIT, Chennai Chennai

4. 86035

Shri Kaushalendra Kumar Singh, CCIT-3, Kolkata

CCIT-4, Kolkata

2. The officers assigned to hold additional charge shall not be eligible for any claim to additional remuneration under the provision of FR-49.

3. Hindi version of this order will follow .

(Yogesh Sharma)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Tel. 011-2309-5474

Copy to:

  1. Officers concerned
  2. Principal CCsIT, Hyderabad / Mumbai / Chennai /
  3. All Principal Chief Commissioners/ Principal Directors General of Income Tax
  4. Principal Chief Controller of Accounts, New Delhi
  5. Zonal Accounts Officer , CBDT, C/o Principal CCIT concerned .
  6. PSs to FM I MOS (Finance).
  7. PPSs to Revenue Secretary / Addl. Secy . (Revenue) / Chairman, CBDT /Members, CBDT / JS (Admn.) CBDT / JS(Revenue) .
  1. Adviser to FM.
  2. Hindi Section for Hindi version .
  3. Secretary General, ITGOA / IRS Association /Income Tax Employees Federation (ITEF) / All India Income Tax SC & ST Employees Welfare Association.
  1. Commissioner of  Income Tax (Media & TP)  and Official Spokesperson , CBDT, North Block, New Delhi
  2. Database Cell, CBDT , New Delhi.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago