Income Tax

Cash deposits in bank can be explained as out of gross receipts u/s 44AD from contract business

Cash deposits in bank can be explained as out of gross receipts u/s 44AD from contract business. ITAT deleted addition made on the basis of peak cash credit

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2818 (2019) (03) ITAT

The assessee had challenged the order of the CIT (Appeals) in confirming addition on the basis of peak credit for cash deposits in bank.

The assessee was an individual engaged in civil contract work. For the relevant AY he filed return of income declaring total income @ 8% on gross receipts from both government and private contract works.

The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the assessee had made deposits in his bank account in cash. When asked to explain the source of cash deposits in the bank account, the assessee attributed the same to the contract receipts which were deposited and withdrawn as per the requirements.

The AO, however, refused to accept the explanation of the assessee and he held that only income from executing the contract works can be explained as source and not the gross contract receipts.

The AO, thereafter, proceeded to work out the peak cash credit and made an addition to the income returned by the assessee.

On appeal by the assessee, the CIT(Appeals) confirmed the order of AO.

The Tribunal opined that though the assessee had not filed the cash flow statement regarding receipts from execution of contracts and outflow of cash, yet the fact remained that the assessee had huge receipts from execution of contracts and the sum deposited in the bank account can be explained as receipts from the contract business.

The Tribunal opined that the AO and the CIT(Appeals) were not justified in giving credits only for the profits earned from contract business at 8% of the receipts from contracts.

Accordingly the Tribunal deleted the addition made by the AO and allowed the appeal of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

2 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 days ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

2 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

3 days ago