CBDT issues Guidelines for identification & processing of cases for prosecution under Income Tax Act. Constitution of Collegium of 2 CCIT/DGIT rank officers.
F.No.285/08/2014-IT(Inv. V)/349
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Direct Taxes)
*******
Room No. 515, 5th Floor, C-Block,
Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Civic Centre,
Minto Road, New Delhi -110002.
Dated: 09.09.2019
The Central Board of Direct Taxes has been issuing guidelines from time to time for streamlining the procedure of identifying and examining the cases for initiating prosecution for offences under Direct Tax Laws. With a view to achieve the objective behind enactment of Chapter XXII of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), and to remove any doubts on the intent to address serious cases effectively, this circular is issued .
2. Prosecution is a criminal proceeding. Therefore, based upon evidence gathered, offence and crime as defined in the relevant provision of the Act, the offence has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt. To ensure that only deserving cases get prosecuted the Central Board of Direct Taxes in exercise of powers under section 119 of the Act lays down the following criteria for launching prosecution in respect of the following categories of offences.
Cases where non-payment of tax deducted at source is Rs. 25 Lakhs or below, and the delay in deposit is less than 60 days from the due date, shall not be processed for prosecution in normal circumstances. In case of exceptional cases like, habitual defaulters, based on particular facts and circumstances of each case, prosecution may be initiated only with the previous administrative approval of the Collegium of two CCTT/DGIT rank officers as mentioned in Para 3.
Same approach as in Para 2.i above.
Cases where the amount sought to be evaded or tax on under -reported income is Rs. 25 Lakhs or below, shall not be processed for prosecution except with the previous administrative approval of the Collegium of two CCIT/DGIT rank officers as mentioned in Para 3.
Further, prosecution under this section shall be launched only after the confirmation of the order imposing penalty by the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Cases where the amount of tax, which would have been evaded if the failure had not been discovered, is Rs. 25 Lakhs or below, shall not be processed for prosecution except with the previous administrative approval of the Collegium of two CCIT/ DGIT rank officers as mentioned in Para 3.
3. For the purposes of this Circular, the constitution of the Collegium of two CCIT/DGIT rank officers would mean the following-
As per section 279(1) of the Act, the sanctioning authority for offences under Chapter XXII is the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals) or the appropriate authority. For proper examination of abcaus.in facts and circumstances of a case, and to ensure that only deserving cases below the threshold limit as prescribed in Annexure get selected for filing of prosecution complaint, such sanctioning authority shall seek the prior administrative approval of a collegium of two CCIT/DGIT rank officers, including the CCIT/DGIT in whose jurisdiction the case lies. The Principal CCIT (CCA) concerned may issue directions for pairing of CCsIT/DGIT for this purpose. In case of disagreement between the two CCIT/DGIT rank officers of the collegium, the matter abcaus.in will be referred to the Principal CCIT(CCA) whose decision will be final. In the event that the Pr. CCIT(CCA) is one of the two officers of the collegium, in case of a disagreement the decision of the Pr. CCIT(CCA) will be final.
4. The list of prosecutable offences under the Act specifying the approving authority is annexed herewith.
5. This Circular shall come into effect immediately and shall apply to all the pending cases where complaint is yet to be filed.
6. Hind version shall follow.
Encl: As above
(Mamta Bansal)
Director to the Government of India
Copy to:
Director to the Government of India
addition u/s 68 addition u/s 69A ca misconduct cash deposit in bank cbdt circular CBDT Instruction cbdt notification cbdt order cbdt press release cgst circular cgst notification cit revision 263 concealment penalty condonation of delay covid-19 custom circular demonetisation due date extension e-way bill faq GST circular GST Council Meeting gst faq gstn advisory GSTR-3B GST rates IBBI ibc itat ITAT Delhi mca circular MCA notification order u/s 119 penalty 271(1)(c) penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Press Release reasons recorded reopening 148 Reopening us 147 Search & Seizure sebi circular transfer and postings unexplained cash credits validity of notice u/s 148 Withdrawal of 2000 500 Bank Notes
Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted in a case where books of account have not been maintained In a recent…
NALCO invites RFP for empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for verification of Stores/Spares and movable assets. NALCO has invited Request…
Sending or bringing currency of Nepal and Bhutan - RBI revises exiting regulations RBI has notified the Foreign Exchange Management…
Entire manufacturing process though by distinct units relevant for exemption from excise duty on account of manufacture without aid of…
High Court condoned delay in filing Form 10B as the failure was in the 1st Year of operation of the…
Penalty u/s 270A quashed as there was no satisfaction in the penalty order on what exactly was under reporting of…