Income Tax

CBDT issues Guidelines for identification & processing of cases for prosecution under Income Tax Act

CBDT issues Guidelines for identification & processing of cases for prosecution under Income Tax Act. Constitution of Collegium of 2 CCIT/DGIT rank officers.

CBDT Guidelines for prosecution of cases 

Circular No.  24 /2019

F.No.285/08/2014-IT(Inv. V)/349
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Direct Taxes)
*******

Room No. 515, 5th Floor, C-Block,
Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Civic Centre,
Minto Road, New Delhi -110002.

Dated: 09.09.2019

Subject: Procedure for identification and processing of cases for prosecution under Direct Tax Laws-reg.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes has been issuing guidelines from time to time for streamlining the procedure of identifying and examining the cases for initiating prosecution for offences under Direct Tax Laws. With a view to achieve the objective behind enactment of Chapter XXII of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), and to remove any doubts on the intent to address serious cases effectively, this circular is issued .

2. Prosecution is a criminal proceeding. Therefore, based upon evidence gathered, offence and crime as defined in the relevant provision of the Act, the offence has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt. To ensure that only deserving cases get prosecuted the Central Board of Direct Taxes in exercise of powers under section 119 of the Act lays down the following criteria for launching prosecution in respect of the following categories of offences.

(i) Offences u/s 276B: Failure to pay tax to the credit of Central Government under Chapter XII-D or XVII-B.

Cases where non-payment of tax deducted at source is Rs. 25 Lakhs or below, and the delay in deposit is less than 60 days from the due date, shall not be processed for prosecution in normal circumstances. In case of exceptional cases like, habitual defaulters, based on particular facts and circumstances of each case, prosecution may be initiated only with the previous administrative approval of the Collegium of two CCTT/DGIT rank officers as mentioned in Para 3.

(ii) Offences u/s 276BB: Failure to pay the tax collected at source.

Same approach as in Para 2.i above.

(iii) Offences u/s 276C(1): Wilful attempt to evade tax, etc.

Cases where the amount sought to be evaded or tax on under -reported income is Rs. 25 Lakhs or below, shall not be  processed  for  prosecution except  with  the  previous administrative approval of the Collegium of two CCIT/DGIT rank officers as mentioned in Para 3.

Further, prosecution under this section shall be launched only after the confirmation of the order imposing penalty  by the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal.

(iv) Offences u/s 276CC: Failure to furnish returns of income.

Cases where the amount of tax, which would have been evaded if the failure had not been discovered, is Rs. 25 Lakhs or below, shall not be processed for prosecution except with the previous administrative approval of the Collegium of two CCIT/ DGIT rank officers as mentioned in Para 3.

3. For  the  purposes  of  this  Circular,  the  constitution of the Collegium of  two CCIT/DGIT rank officers would mean the following-

As per section 279(1) of the Act, the sanctioning authority for offences under Chapter XXII is the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals) or the appropriate authority. For proper examination of abcaus.in facts and circumstances of a case, and to ensure that only deserving cases below the threshold limit as prescribed in Annexure get selected for filing of prosecution complaint, such sanctioning authority shall seek the prior administrative approval of a collegium of two CCIT/DGIT rank officers, including the CCIT/DGIT in whose jurisdiction the case lies. The Principal CCIT (CCA) concerned may issue directions for pairing of CCsIT/DGIT for this purpose. In case of disagreement between the two CCIT/DGIT rank officers of the collegium, the matter abcaus.in will be referred to the Principal CCIT(CCA) whose decision will be final. In the event that the Pr. CCIT(CCA) is one of the two officers of the collegium, in case of a disagreement the decision of the Pr. CCIT(CCA) will be final.

4. The list of prosecutable offences under the Act specifying the approving authority is annexed herewith.

5. This Circular shall come into effect immediately and shall apply to all the pending cases where complaint is yet to be filed.

6. Hind version shall follow.

Encl: As above

(Mamta Bansal)
Director to the Government of India

Copy to:

  1. P .S. to Finance  Minister
  2. P.S. to Revenue Secretary
  3. The Chairman and  all  the Members, CBDT
  4. All the Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners /Pr. Director Generals/ Director Generals of Income-tax
  5. All the officers of the rank of Joint Secretary/CIT and above in the CBDT
  6. CIT(Media and Technical Policy), CBDT
  7. ADG (Systems)-4/ Web Manager for placing it on www.incometaxindia .gov.in
  8. Add CIT, Data Base Cell- for placing it on www.irsofficersonline.gov.in
  9. The Guard File

Director to the Government of India

Download CBDT Circular for prosecution of cases Click Here >>

addition u/s 68 ca misconduct cash deposit in bank cbdt circular CBDT Instruction cbdt notification cbdt order cbdt press release cgst circular cgst notification cit revision 263 concealment penalty covid-19 custom circular demonetisation due date extension e-way bill faq GST circular GST Council Meeting gst faq gstn advisory gstr-1 GSTR-3B GST rates IBBI ibc icai announcement itat mca circular MCA notification order u/s 119 penalty 271(1)(c) penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Press Release reasons recorded reopening 148 Reopening us 147 Search & Seizure sebi circular sebi regulations transfer and postings unexplained cash credits validity of notice u/s 148 Withdrawal of 2000 500 Bank Notes

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

5 hours ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

7 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

21 hours ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

2 days ago