Income Tax

Google India gets relief in deposit against income tax demand from High Court.

Google India gets relief in deposit against income tax demand from High Court. The High Court reduced the deposit to 30% against the outstanding tax demand from 50% as directed by the ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2020 (2017) (08) HC

Brief Facts of the Case:

The petitioner-company M/s. Google India Pvt. Ltd. was aggrieved by the stay order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directing the Internet Search Giant to deposit 50% of the impugned tax demand and out of such 50% of the tax demand, 20% was directed to be deposited within seven days and balance amount was to be paid within 180 days in six equal installments.

In view of the pendency of the cases, the Hon’ble High Court did not incline to go into the merit of the case and opined that they deserve to be heard by the Tribunal itself. However the ITAT was requested to decide the pending appeals expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months.

The Counsel for the petitioner-company referred to paragraph of the impugned order of the ITAT towards the suggestion of the ITAT that the Tribunal could stay the demand, subject to the condition of payment of 30% of the total tax demand, which, however was not accepted by the petitioner-company.

It was submitted that the company should be allowed to abide by the suggestion of the ITAT as stated in the impugned order and the petitioner company would be willing to deposit 30% of the total tax demand as indicated by the ITAT itself and the remaining 10% of the said demand may be directed to be deposited within a period of one month, since 20% of the total demand which was required to be deposited within seven days of the order passed by the ITAT stood deposited by the petitioner-company.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that the said prayer was found to be in tune with the suggestion of the Bench of ITAT itself in its order. The Hon’ble High Court stated that even though, it was not inclined to interfere with the aforesaid interlocutory interim order passed by the ITAT but in the facts and circumstances of the case, the said submission could be accepted even at this stage, coupled with the request made to the Tribunal to decide the present appeal as well as the connected appeals expeditiously.

Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court made a slight modification of the direction given by the Tribunal that instead of 50% of the total tax demand, the petitioner-company may deposit 30% of the said total tax demand disputed before the learned Tribunal and if the petitioner company has already deposited 20% of the tax demand in view of the direction of the Tribunal, remaining 10% of the same to be deposited by the petitioner-company within the period of one month.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

10 hours ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago