Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 54EC for delay in cheque clearance for purchase of REC Bonds

No disallowance u/s 54EC for delay in cheque clearance for investment in REC Bonds which was attributable to the banking channel – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2722 (2019) (01) ITAT

This appeal by the assessee was directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in disallowing exemption u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the ground that the investment in REC Bonds was made beyond the stipulated time.

Against the long term capital gain (LTCG) earned on transfer of immovable property, the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 54EC by showing an investment in the Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) bonds.

As per section 54EC, the assessee is required to make investment in the specified bonds within six months from the date of the transfer of immovable property.

The case of the assessee was that he issued the cheques for investment in REC within the stipulated time though they were presented to the bank and were debited in assessee’s bank accounts after the stipulated time limit.

However, the AO held that the assessee had invested in REC bonds beyond the permissible time limit for claiming exemption u/s 54EC of the Act and accordingly, the AO disallowed the said exemption claimed by the assessee and added to the total income of the assessee.

The CIT(A) did not agreed with the assessee’s contention and upheld the AO’s action.

The Tribunal noted that note that the assessee had duly issued the cheque for the investment in accordance with the act. The delay of the bank in clearing the amount was a meager delay of only four days which was attributable to the banking channel.

The Tribunal opined that opinion, adverse inference could not be drawn against the assessee on the technical ground of delay of merely four days in clearance of the cheque.

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the authorities below and decided the issue in favour of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO is under an obligation to assign reasons for rejecting explanation of the assessee

AO is under an obligation to duly consider the explanation furnished by the assessee and assign reasons for rejecting the…

5 hours ago
  • Excise/Custom

CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices

CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices under Postal Import Regulations, 2025.  Standard Operating Procedure…

6 hours ago
  • civil-law

Sale deed executed with full knowledge of only part consideration paid, not void – SC

Sale deed executed with full knowledge of only part consideration paid, cannot be rendered void or inoperative merely for non…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No fault in serving notice to last known address when PAN data was not updated – ITAT

No fault in serving notice u/s 148 to last known address when assessee had not updated change of address in…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Investment by firm through capital introduced by partners cannot be treated as unexplained

Investment made by firm through capital introduced by partners cannot be treated as unexplained investment in the hands of the…

1 day ago
  • ICAI

Hosting of Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF) – 2026-27. Last date to apply : 29.08.2026

Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 is hosted - Last date for submission is 29.08.2026 ICAI has hosted the Multipurpose Empanelment…

2 days ago