Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 54EC for delay in cheque clearance for purchase of REC Bonds

No disallowance u/s 54EC for delay in cheque clearance for investment in REC Bonds which was attributable to the banking channel – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2722 (2019) (01) ITAT

This appeal by the assessee was directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in disallowing exemption u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the ground that the investment in REC Bonds was made beyond the stipulated time.

Against the long term capital gain (LTCG) earned on transfer of immovable property, the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 54EC by showing an investment in the Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) bonds.

As per section 54EC, the assessee is required to make investment in the specified bonds within six months from the date of the transfer of immovable property.

The case of the assessee was that he issued the cheques for investment in REC within the stipulated time though they were presented to the bank and were debited in assessee’s bank accounts after the stipulated time limit.

However, the AO held that the assessee had invested in REC bonds beyond the permissible time limit for claiming exemption u/s 54EC of the Act and accordingly, the AO disallowed the said exemption claimed by the assessee and added to the total income of the assessee.

The CIT(A) did not agreed with the assessee’s contention and upheld the AO’s action.

The Tribunal noted that note that the assessee had duly issued the cheque for the investment in accordance with the act. The delay of the bank in clearing the amount was a meager delay of only four days which was attributable to the banking channel.

The Tribunal opined that opinion, adverse inference could not be drawn against the assessee on the technical ground of delay of merely four days in clearance of the cheque.

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the authorities below and decided the issue in favour of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

17 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago