Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 54EC for delay in cheque clearance for purchase of REC Bonds

No disallowance u/s 54EC for delay in cheque clearance for investment in REC Bonds which was attributable to the banking channel – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2722 (2019) (01) ITAT

This appeal by the assessee was directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in disallowing exemption u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the ground that the investment in REC Bonds was made beyond the stipulated time.

Against the long term capital gain (LTCG) earned on transfer of immovable property, the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 54EC by showing an investment in the Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) bonds.

As per section 54EC, the assessee is required to make investment in the specified bonds within six months from the date of the transfer of immovable property.

The case of the assessee was that he issued the cheques for investment in REC within the stipulated time though they were presented to the bank and were debited in assessee’s bank accounts after the stipulated time limit.

However, the AO held that the assessee had invested in REC bonds beyond the permissible time limit for claiming exemption u/s 54EC of the Act and accordingly, the AO disallowed the said exemption claimed by the assessee and added to the total income of the assessee.

The CIT(A) did not agreed with the assessee’s contention and upheld the AO’s action.

The Tribunal noted that note that the assessee had duly issued the cheque for the investment in accordance with the act. The delay of the bank in clearing the amount was a meager delay of only four days which was attributable to the banking channel.

The Tribunal opined that opinion, adverse inference could not be drawn against the assessee on the technical ground of delay of merely four days in clearance of the cheque.

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the authorities below and decided the issue in favour of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Expenses on making house habitable not renovation, exemption u/s 54 allowed

Expenses for making house habitable are not renovation expenses and hence qualified for exemption u/s 54 In a recent order,…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Depreciation on revalued cost of assets after conversion of firm into company upheld

Claiming depreciation on revalued cost of assets after conversion of partnership firm into company Supreme Court dismissed Special Leave Petition…

3 days ago
  • GST

GST Exemption on various services provided by Railways & Accommodation Services

Exemption from GST on various services provided by Railways & Accommodation Services MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) Notification No.…

3 days ago
  • GST

Agricultural farm produce supply taken out of GST on ‘pre-packaged and labelled’

Supply of agricultural farm produce in package(s) of more than 25 KG/litre shall not be considered supply of ‘pre-packaged and…

3 days ago
  • Empanelment

RBI invites E-tender for appointment of Concurrent Auditor 01.10.2024 to 30.09.2025

RBI invites E-tender for appointment of Chartered Accountants as Concurrent Auditor for the period from 01.10.2024 to 30.09.2025 Reserve Bank…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Expression “purposes of business” is wider than “purpose of earning profits” – ITAT

Commercial expediency - Expression “for the purposes of the business” is wider than "for the purpose of earning profits” -…

4 days ago