TAN Name Branch Office Mismatch Errors in NSDL Latest RPU version 1.50 -How to resolve?
NSDL has released e-TDS Return Preparation Utility (RPU) version 1.50 applicable from 13-04-2016. However, users are getting error messages while creating/validating files.
The errors related to two type of mismatch as under:
The error code is :
T_FV_6069 Mismatch in TAN present in statement and .csi file imported, kindly provide valid TAN
The error code is :
T_FV_6054 Invalid value provided under Deductor’s Branch/Division. Kindly provide valid value
Steps to resolve RPU 1.50 TAN Name/Branch Mismtach errors
In the latest RPU, while filling the basic data in form 24Q or 26Q, the following precautions must be taken to avoid the above validation errors while creating fvu file for submission.
1. Name of the deductor should filled same as per TAN details in Income Tax database.
Spaces, spellings and small/cap alphabets should be written in the same order as per TAN database.
Exact Name of the deductor can be viewed from Know your TAN link
2. The Branch/Divisions details should not be left blank
If the deductor (employer) do not have a branch, write “NOT APPLICABLE” and do not leave it blank.
3. Use CSI file to know the exact name and TAN and fill Form 24Q / 26Q accordingly.
CSI file downloaded from NSDL website contains the name and TAN of the deductor, to avoid any mismatch, the name of the deductor should be copied and pasted from it to the Form 24Q/26Q.
Steps to open and view csi file
a) download csi file from NSDL website
(b) Right click on the file and open it in notepad
(c) Typically contents of the csi file will appear as under:
4^LKNT05685G^SAMPLE COMPANY LIMITED ^00000000000000801297
c25acf00b060ffcaec5a5723f25c559e
a13ebf3fa247824d6fd2dcaf11cf65c4
b225bdc2170a5ae8ce2a50548475dce6
241756bbd83451a444d66cefae40c88a
You will note that both TAN and the name of deductor appear between ^ ^. Copy and paste the same in Form 24Q/26Q details.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…
View Comments
Thank you very much for the info - an instant help
how to know our branch/division
Thanks for the very much needed assistance in filing e-tds statement using FVU 5.0