Waiver of rent payable by tenant amounts to application of income and therefore taxable. It cannot be construed as overriding title – ITAT
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3137 (2019) (09) ITAT
The assessee had appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in confirming the taxation of rent waived.
The assessee was a Private Limited Company, which had let out a vacant industrial shed to its subsidiary company for a rent. Howver, the assessee did not offer the rental income to tax.
Before the Assessing Officer (AO), the assessee explained that the subsidiary company to whom the premises was let out was incurring persistent losses. Therefore, the rent could not be recovered.
It was explained that since the assessee could not recover the rent from the subsidiary company, it was decided to waive the rent by a resolution and even the rent relatable to earlier period was transferred to share capital account so that the rent payable by the subsidiary company may be treated as capital contribution by the assessee.
However the AO was not convinced by the submission of the assessee and brought to tax the amount of rent. CIT(A) confirmed the addition.
The Tribunal noted that a factory premises was let out to the subsidiary company / joint venture company. It was not in dispute that the subsidiary company / joint venture company was persistently incurring losses. Therefore, the assessee could not recover the rent from the said company.
The Tribunal also noted that the assessee had to pay service tax on the said rent to the Government. The earlier period rent was transferred to the capital account and it was treated as capital contribution by the assessee.
The question for consideration before the ITAT was when the tenant could not pay the rent or the assessee could not recover the rent, can landlord waive the rent payable by the tenant? And whether such rent is assessable in the hands of the assessee or not?
The Tribunal opined that when the assessee let out the property for payment of rent, merely because the tenant which happened to be subsidiary company / joint venture company was incurring persistent loss and the rent was waived, could not be a reason not to tax the amount due from tenant.
The Tribunal explained that in other words, the rent payable by the tenant by waiver would amount to application of income and it could not be construed as overriding title. It was passed on to the tenant.
The Tribunal pointed out that on accrual basis, the rental income was accrued to the assessee. It was upto the assessee either to treat as capital contribution or otherwise. However, the assessee was liable to pay income-tax on such receipt /accruals.
Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the order of the lower authority and the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.
addition u/s 68 ca misconduct cash deposit in bank cbdt circular CBDT Instruction cbdt notification cbdt order cbdt press release cgst circular cgst notification cit revision 263 concealment penalty covid-19 custom circular demonetisation due date extension e-way bill faq GST circular GST Council Meeting gst faq gstn advisory gstr-1 GSTR-3B GST rates IBBI ibc icai announcement itat mca circular MCA notification order u/s 119 penalty 271(1)(c) penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Press Release reasons recorded reopening 148 Reopening us 147 Search & Seizure sebi circular sebi regulations transfer and postings unexplained cash credits validity of notice u/s 148 Withdrawal of 2000 500 Bank Notes
Union Budget 2024-25 - Highlights of Tax Proposals - Watch Live The Union Finance Minister MS Sitharaman shall be presenting…
Before Amendment Section 14A cannot be invoked if no exempt income was earned - ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT…
Patent Agent Exam 2025 & Trade Marks Agent Exam 2025. Last date to apply 08.08.2024 Office of the Controller General…
Penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) can not be levied on adhoc additions - ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Hyderabad has held…
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect must be informed by reason - High Court In a recent judgment, Hon'ble…
CPC intimation u/s 143(1) valid though digitally signed after expiry of limitation period - ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT…