Excise/Custom

SCN issued for change in excise classification of goods barred by limitation being known to deptt.

The Show cause notice issued for change in excise classification of goods was barred by limitation, as it was intimated – SC dismissed appeal of the Department

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2853 (2019) (04) SC

The appellant had changed the goods classification under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On the basis of said change in classification, investigation was conducted and thereafter a show cause notice was issued to classify the product under old headings of the Tariff Act by invoking extended period of limitation.

The matter was adjudicated and by invoking the extended period of limitation, the demand was confirmed along with interest and penalty was imposed on the appellant.

Against the said order, the appellant approached the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)

The CESTAT observed that the appellant had written a letter to the department for change of their classification and also filed ER-1 return accordingly.

The CESTAT held that as the fact of change in classification was in the knowledge of the department, therefore, the show cause notice issued to the appellant was barred by limitation.

Accordingly, CESTAT held that for the period within limitation the appellant was liable to pay duty along with interest. As the action of the appellant was in the knowledge of the department itself, therefore, no penalty was imposable on the appellant.

It was further held that as the appellant was liable to pay duty and had not availed Cenvat credit on input and input services, for the period for which demand had been confirmed, the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit on input and input services.

Against the abobe order passed by the CESTAT, the excise department had filed an appeal to the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CESTAT and dismissed the appeal

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Once ITR is filled in response to notice u/s 148 though late, notice u/s 143(2) is must – ITAT

Once assessee filed ITR, in response to the notice u/s 148 of the Act, even beyond time prescribed, Assessing Officer…

2 days ago
  • tender

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for giving EMD by way of FD not DD

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for submitting EMD by way of Fixed Deposit in place of Demand Draft -…

2 days ago
  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash payment for purchase of land or property not violation of 269SS or 269T

Cash payment for purchase of land or property cannot be treated as violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Excel Utility for ITR-1 and ITR-4 available for e-filing for AY 2026-27

Income Tax Department has released excel Utility for e-filing ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27 Excel utilities of ITR-1 and…

6 days ago