Excise/Custom

SCN issued for change in excise classification of goods barred by limitation being known to deptt.

The Show cause notice issued for change in excise classification of goods was barred by limitation, as it was intimated – SC dismissed appeal of the Department

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2853 (2019) (04) SC

The appellant had changed the goods classification under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On the basis of said change in classification, investigation was conducted and thereafter a show cause notice was issued to classify the product under old headings of the Tariff Act by invoking extended period of limitation.

The matter was adjudicated and by invoking the extended period of limitation, the demand was confirmed along with interest and penalty was imposed on the appellant.

Against the said order, the appellant approached the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)

The CESTAT observed that the appellant had written a letter to the department for change of their classification and also filed ER-1 return accordingly.

The CESTAT held that as the fact of change in classification was in the knowledge of the department, therefore, the show cause notice issued to the appellant was barred by limitation.

Accordingly, CESTAT held that for the period within limitation the appellant was liable to pay duty along with interest. As the action of the appellant was in the knowledge of the department itself, therefore, no penalty was imposable on the appellant.

It was further held that as the appellant was liable to pay duty and had not availed Cenvat credit on input and input services, for the period for which demand had been confirmed, the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit on input and input services.

Against the abobe order passed by the CESTAT, the excise department had filed an appeal to the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CESTAT and dismissed the appeal

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No immunity from prosecution u/s 276B merely because TDS was deposited belatedly

Assessee cannot be granted immunity from prosecution u/s 276B for late deposit of TDS merely because ultimately TDS was deposited…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Section 44C applies to exclusive expenditure by head office by non resident assessee – SC

Section 44C applies to exclusive expenditure on head office for the Indian branches incurred by non resident assessee’s. In a…

4 hours ago
  • Insurance

MV Act Compensation to parents of child died is at different footing than disabled child

Compensation under motor vehicle Act to parents of child died attract a less multiplier than from that of a claim…

5 hours ago
  • GST

Extension of time limit for furnishing GSTR 3B under Delhi GST Act 2017

Extension of time limit for furnishing GSTR 3B under Delhi GST Act 2017 Department of Trade and Taxes(Policy and Research…

10 hours ago
  • ICAI

Audit Fee to be received only by digital modes/banking channels -ICAI revises Ethics

Acceptance of Audit Fee only through digital modes or banking channels from 01.04.2026 – ICAI revises Code of Ethics  In…

17 hours ago
  • Service Tax

Demand set aside as assessee for period covered had discharged tax liability under SVLDRS

High Court sets aside demand notices in respect of a period, for which the assessee had discharged tax liability under…

1 day ago