Income Tax

Addition u/s 68 for unsecured loans/share capital on account of amalgamation deleted

Addition u/s 68 for unsecured loans/share capital on account of amalgamation as per High Court order deleted as no sum was actually received

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3545 (2021) (08) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition of Share Capital / Share Premium / unsecured loans made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as alleged unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The assessee was one of the companies covered under the search operations u/s 132 of the Act. Therefore, the case of the assessee was picked up for scrutiny.

Nine different companies amalgamated in the assessee company as per Order of the Hon’ble High court u/s 394 of the companies act. All the assets and liabilities of nine Transferor companies were incorporated in the balance sheet of the assessee company and shareholders of those    nine companies were issued shares of the assessee company as per exchange ratio as per the scheme of amalgamation.

The AO noticed that assessee had huge amount of unsecured loan and the share capital. The assessee submitted it had not received any amount during the year but the same was on account of merger vide order of the  Hon’ble High Court wherein different companies were amalgamated with the assessee company and the share capital represented shares allotted to the shareholders of amalgamated  companies with respect to the unsecured loans it was stated that the  same was also on account of amalgamation order and the assessee did not  received  any  sum during the year except small amount.

The Tribunal noted that no share capital was received during the year but only in exchange of the shares of the transferor companies, the shares had been allotted to the shareholders of the transferor companies.

The return of allotment filed with the Registrar of Companies also clearly showed that the share capital is only on account of amalgamation approved by the Hon’ble High Court.

The Tribunal opined that as there was no sum of money received during the year, addition u/s 68 on account of the share capital can not be made.

With respect to most of the unsecured loans, the Tribunal noted that the amount had been transferred on account of amalgamation. The assessee had also submitted the annual audited accounts as well as confirmation of the parties to show the above fact.  Even the copies of the confirmation, income tax returns of the parties were also submitted.

The Tribunal noted that the fact remained that most of amount had resulted on account of amalgamation of different companies with the assessee and no fresh sum was received during the year by the assessee with respect to all the loans and advances.

Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the addition made by the AO on account of share capital as well as unsecured loan and allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

Empanelment of ICAI Exam observer for January 2027 Examinations. Last date: 20.11.2026

Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…

2 hours ago
  • GST

No arrest under GST- Major decision of 57th Meeting of GST Council held on 8th October 2026

No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

5 days ago