Tag: search u/s 132
Explanation that jewellery was acquired out of agricultural income of Bigger HUF before its partition cannot be termed as not plausible – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3753 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
There is no provision in the Income Tax Act to tax the difference between value of jewellery declared and jewellery found in search as deemed sale ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3744 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Addition based on projected income surrendered during search deleted as actual gross income reported in audited accounts was higher ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3738 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by CIT(A)/FAA deleting the addition for undisclosed profit made by …
Drawings and returned income speak volumes about richness of family – ITAT deleted addition for jewellery found during search. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3737 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Ashok Chaddha vs. ITO 14 taxman.com 57 In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …
Amendment to Section 153C vide Finance Act, 2015 applicable to searches conducted u/s 132 before 01.06.2015 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3698 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 2014 SCC OnLine Del …
Period of limitation for block assessment u/s 158BC/158BE commences from the date of last Panchnama, not the date of last authorization – SC ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3692 (2023) (03) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:C. Ramaiah Reddy v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (2011)244 …
Onus to explain investment sources by wife discharged when she and her husband both admitted that husbands paid the money – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3644 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition …
Non searched persons liable to pay interest on late filing of return u/s 158BC even in absence of a notice u/s 158BC and even for the period prior to 01.06.1999 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3643 (2023) (01) SC Important Case Laws relied upon:Mathuram Agrawal …
Jewellery can not be held unexplained simply because weight of Gold coins was not stated in the Will and only number of gold coins were mentioned ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3570 (2022) (01) ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that Jewellery can not be held unexplained …
Addition u/s 68 for unsecured loans/share capital on account of amalgamation as per High Court order deleted as no sum was actually received ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3545 (2021) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
