Tag: search u/s 132
Undated, unsigned and typed loose sheet of paper are dumb document, could not be taken as the sole basis for determination of undisclosed income In a recent judgment, ITAT Amritsar has held that undated, unsigned and typed loose sheet of paper without witness, without any acceptable narration are …
Authorized Officer issuing warrant of authorization of search u/s 132(1) can not issue notice u/s 131(1A) post-search operation. In a recent judgment, the Allahabad High Court has held that the Authorized Officer who issued warrant of authorization of search u/s 132(1) can not issue notice u/s 131(1A) post-search …
Bulk entries passed in books of accounts cannot be said to be entirely bogus expenses – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Chennai has held that practice of making bulk entries in books of accounts is indeed an accounting anomaly, but cannot be straightaway construed as booking …
SC declines to interfere with HC order seeking intervention of PM office for action against Income Tax officials In a recent order, Hon’ble Supreme Court has declined to interfere with Hon’ble Bombay High Court judgment seeking intervention of PM office to take action against Income Tax officials for …
No prosecution u/s 275B when electronic gadgets and ERP user IDs and passwords was provided to search party – Sessions Court In a recent judgment, the Sessions court has set aside the summon order holding hat Vague or incongruous answers to questions do not attract section 275B except …
Under section 271AAB undisclosed income also means additional income due to bogus expense recorded in the books of accounts – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3820 (2023) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:ACIT vs. Sri Mahender Kumar AgarwalCIT vs. Harjeev Aggarwal, 70 taxmann.com 95 Radhey …
To attract provisions of section 69A sine qua non is “ownership” of money etc. which is not recorded in the books of account not mere presumption- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3819 (2023) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Common cause v. UOI 77 taxmann.com 245 …
Explanation that jewellery was acquired out of agricultural income of Bigger HUF before its partition cannot be termed as not plausible – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3753 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
There is no provision in the Income Tax Act to tax the difference between value of jewellery declared and jewellery found in search as deemed sale ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3744 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Addition based on projected income surrendered during search deleted as actual gross income reported in audited accounts was higher ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3738 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by CIT(A)/FAA deleting the addition for undisclosed profit made by …
