Tag: search u/s 132
Drawings and returned income speak volumes about richness of family – ITAT deleted addition for jewellery found during search. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3737 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Ashok Chaddha vs. ITO 14 taxman.com 57 In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …
Amendment to Section 153C vide Finance Act, 2015 applicable to searches conducted u/s 132 before 01.06.2015 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3698 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 2014 SCC OnLine Del …
Period of limitation for block assessment u/s 158BC/158BE commences from the date of last Panchnama, not the date of last authorization – SC ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3692 (2023) (03) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:C. Ramaiah Reddy v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (2011)244 …
Onus to explain investment sources by wife discharged when she and her husband both admitted that husbands paid the money – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3644 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition …
Non searched persons liable to pay interest on late filing of return u/s 158BC even in absence of a notice u/s 158BC and even for the period prior to 01.06.1999 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3643 (2023) (01) SC Important Case Laws relied upon:Mathuram Agrawal …
Jewellery can not be held unexplained simply because weight of Gold coins was not stated in the Will and only number of gold coins were mentioned ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3570 (2022) (01) ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that Jewellery can not be held unexplained …
Addition u/s 68 for unsecured loans/share capital on account of amalgamation as per High Court order deleted as no sum was actually received ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3545 (2021) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …
Data retrieved from Pen-drive and admission by vendors though may have a persuasive value no substantive evidentiary value to make additions. Data retrieved from digital device certificate u/s 65B(4) of Evidence Act must prove its authenticity. In the instant case, the assessee had cjhallenged the order passed by …
CBDT Circular though meant for non-seizure of jewellery takes into account quantity of jewellery generally held by family members of a Hindu Family ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3482 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the …
Addition made on the basis of cancelled money receipt found during search quashed as its contents was not confronted with issuer ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3401 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties: In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed …
