Income Tax

Procedure for Scrutiny of Startup Companies on application of section 56(2)(viib)-CBDT Circular

Procedure for Scrutiny assessment of Startup Companies on application of section 56(2)(viib). Clarification by CBDT

Circular No. 16/2019

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

North-Block, New Delhi, dated the 7th of August,2019

Subject:- Clarification with respect to assessment of Startup Companies involving application of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.-reg.

Instances have come to the notice of the Board that notices u/s 143{2)/147 have been issued by the Assessing Officers in respect of Startup Companies, before the issue of notification of the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (henceforth referred to as ‘DPIIT’) dated 19.02.2019 or even afterwards which are presently pending for disposal. These companies have been recognized by the DPIIT after the issue of their notification dated 19.02.2019.

2. The DPIIT vide notification G.S.R. 127 (E) dated 19.02.2019, has laid down that the provisions of section 56(2)(viib) of the I.T. Act, 1961 shall not apply to any consideration received by a Startup Company, if the Startup Company fulfils the conditions mentioned in para 4(i) and 4(ii) of the  said notification and is recognized by the DPIIT.

3. In pursuance to the above, the Central Board of Direct Taxes  (CBDT)  had issued Notification no. 13/2019/F.No. 370142/5/2018-TPL(Pt.) dated 05th March, 2019  reiterating that the provisions of clause (viib) of sub-section (2) of section 56 of the said Act shall not apply to consideration received by a company for issue of shares that exceeds the face value of such shares, if the said consideration has been received from a person, being a resident, by a company which fulfils the conditions specified in para 4 of the notification dated 19.02.2019 issued by DPIIT.

4. In the light of the above,  the following procedure is laid down with regard to the assessment of such startup entities involving the issue of sect ion 56(2)(viib).

(i) Where the Startup Company has been recognised by the DPIIT but the case is selected abcaus.in under “limited scrutiny” on the single issue of applicability of section 56 (2)(viib), no verification on such issues will be done by the AOs during the proceedings u/s 143 (3)/147 of the T. Act, 1961 and the contention of such recognized Startup Companies on the issue will be summarily accepted.

(ii) Where the Startup Company has been recognized by the DPIIT but the case is selected under “limited scrutiny” with multiple issues or under “complete scrutiny” including the issue u/s 56(2)(viib), the issue of applicability of section 56 (2)(viib) will not be pursued during the assessment proceedings and inquiry or verification with regard to other issues in such cases shall be carried out by the Assessing Officer, only after obtaining approval of his/her supervisory officer. Due procedure as per I.T. Act shall be followed with regard to other issues for which the case has been selected.

(iii) Where the Startup Company has not got DPIIT approval and the case is selected for scrutiny , inter alia on the grounds of applicability of section 56(2)(viib) or any other issue/s, then also inquiry or verification in such cases shall be carried out by the Assessing  Officer, as  per  due  procedure, only  after  obtaining  approval  of  his/her supervisory officer.

2. Hindi version to follow .

(Prajna Paramita)
Addl. CIT-OSD (ITA-I), CBDT

 

(F.No. 173/149 /2019-ITA-1)

Procedure for Startup Companies Scrutiny on Angel Tax application-Download CBDT Circular No. 16/2019 Click Here >>

addition u/s 68 addition u/s 69A ca misconduct cash deposit in bank cbdt circular CBDT Instruction cbdt notification cbdt order cbdt press release cgst circular cgst notification cit revision 263 concealment penalty condonation of delay covid-19 custom circular demonetisation due date extension e-way bill faq GST circular GST Council Meeting gst faq gstn advisory GSTR-3B GST rates IBBI ibc income tax prosecution itat ITAT Delhi mca circular MCA notification order u/s 119 penalty 271(1)(c) penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Press Release reasons recorded reopening 148 Reopening us 147 Search & Seizure sebi circular unexplained cash credits validity of notice u/s 148 Withdrawal of 2000 500 Bank Notes

Share

Recent Posts

  • RBI

RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to banks

RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to bank RBI has issued RBI Credit Risk Management Directions, 2025 defining ‘Related Party’…

1 day ago
  • GST

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025 Dear Taxpayers, The relevant declarations issued vide Notification No. 05/2025 –…

3 days ago
  • GST

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at threshold

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

6 days ago