SEBI

Stock brokers may fund payment of exercise price in ESOP and/or RSUs

Stock brokers may fund payment of exercise price in ESOP and/or RSUs which shall be adjusted against the sale proceeds

The applicant was a registered Stock Broker. It sought clarification from SEBI under the Informal Guidance Scheme on the interpretation of Regulation 9(2) of SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014 (SBEB Regulations).

A Listed company had approached the applicant, as a registered Stock Broker for Cashless funding of RSUs being offered to their employees as a part of Employee compensation plan.

The current Market price per share was around Rs. 650/- and face value per share was Rs. 5/-. The Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) were being issued at face value to the eligible employees and as per the approved scheme the employee was required to pay the issue price plus the applicable Perquisite Tax for the eligible exercise quantity of RSU (Funding Amount).

The applicant had sought guidance from SEBI by way of an interpretive letter on the following:

1. Whether the applicant, as a registered stock Broker under SEBJ Stock Broker Regulations, 1992 was permitted to fund the securities to be issued under the Securities Exchange Board of India (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations 2014 (viz. Employee Stock Option and/or Restricted Stock Units) by a Listed Company, to its Employees who propose to avail Cashless option.

2. In case such funding is permitted, then the maximum amount per unit/security that can be funded

SEBI informed that Regulation 9(2) of the SBEB Regulations provide that no person other than the employee to whom the option, SAR or other benefit is granted is entitled to the benefit arising out of such option, SAR, benefit etc. Provided that in case of ESOS or SAR, under cashless exercise, the company may itself fund or permit the empanelled stock brokers to fund the payment of exercise price which shall be adjusted against the sale proceeds of some or all the shares, subject to the provisions of the applicable law or regulations.

Accordingly, SEBI opined that the company may permit the empaneled stock brokers to fund the payment of exercise price which shall be adjusted against the sale proceeds of some or all the shares, subject to the provisions of the applicable law or regulations. Thus, if the company permits, the applicant may fund the payment of exercise price which shall be adjusted against the sale proceeds of some or all the shares, subject to the provisions of the applicable law or regulations.

Also, the extant SBEB Regulations do not prescribe for any maximum limit on amount per unit/security that can be funded.

Download Informal Guidance Letter Click Here >> 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

J&K Bank Ltd. invites on-line applications for empanelment as Stock Auditors

The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. invites on-line applications for empanelment as Stock Auditors for 3 Financial Years i.e. from…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Broken period interest on securities held as stock-in-trade is revenue expenditure

Broken period interest paid on purchase of securities was revenue expenditure since the securities constituted stock-in-trade In a recent judgment,…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Reassessment on basis of borrowed belief of Anti-Corruption Bureau quashed

ITAT quashed reassessment on the basis of borrowed belief of Anti-Corruption Bureau without applying mind In a recent judgment, ITAT…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

In considering disallowance u/s 40A(2) genuineness of expenditure not relevant issue

In considering disallowance u/s 40A(2) for payments to specified persons, genuineness of expenditure is not a relevant issue. In a…

24 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Expression “Yes I am satisfied” in approval u/s 151 not a vital defect – ITAT

Expression “Yes I am satisfied” in approval u/s 151 not such a vital defect on the basis of which, re-opening…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Section 143(1) Intimation not an order for Revision u/s 264 of Income Tax Act

Section 143(1) Intimation is only an intimation and it cannot be treated as an order for the purpose of Section…

1 day ago