Excise/Custom

CBIC revises jurisdiction of customs officers for the purpose of appeals

CBIC revises jurisdiction of customs officers for appeals purposes in respect of bill of entry entered for home consumption or warehousing
 
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)

Notification No.63/2020-Customs (N.T.)

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2020
 
G.S.R.482(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 92/2017-Customs (N.T.), dated the 28th September, 2017, namely:-
 
In the said notification, in paragraph 1, for the provisos, the following provisos shall be substituted,namely :-
 
“Provided that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Bengaluru, shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against the serial nos.1, 5, and 6 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 7 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-1) Chennai and the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) Chennai, shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 1 and 7 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial nos. 5 and 6 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi, shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against the serial nos.5, 6, and 7of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no.1 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai-I shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 3 and 4 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 2 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai-II shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 2 and 4 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 3 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai-III, shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 2 and 3 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 4 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act”.
[F.No. 437/48/2014-Cus.IV]
 
ANANTH RATHAKRISHNAN, Dy. Secy. (Customs)
 
Note: The principal Notification No. 92/2017-Customs(N.T.),dated the 28th September, 2017, was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R.1210(E), dated the 28th September, 2017, and was last amended by Notification No. 51/2020-Customs(N.T.),dated the 5th June 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R.353(E) dated the 5th June, 2020.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Credit in partner’s capital account for book entry adjustments can not be added u/s 68

Credit in assessee’s capital account consequent to book entry adjustments in the books of the partnership firm can not be…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Non-compliance of summons issued u/s 131 no ground to make addition u/s 68

Non-compliance of summons issued u/s 131 by investing companies is no ground to make addition under section 68 of the…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee not obliged to demonstrate actual utilization of donation u/s 35(1)(ii)

Assessee not obliged to demonstrate actual utilization of donation u/s 35(1)(ii) for scientific research made to an eligible institution In…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

For Registration u/s 12AB, phrase “genuineness of activities” is interpreted liberally

Phrase "genuineness of activities" has been interpreted liberally by various judicial forums including the ITAT and High Courts - ITAT…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

If AO rejects a reply, he has to offer opportunity of personal hearing to assessee

If assessing officer rejects a reply, he had to offer an opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee– Allahabad High…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Decisions of withdrawal & redeposit of cash fall within domain of commercial expediency

Business decisions such as withdrawal and redeposit of cash fall within the domain of commercial expediency and AO cannot substitute…

4 days ago