Excise/Custom

CBIC revises jurisdiction of customs officers for the purpose of appeals

CBIC revises jurisdiction of customs officers for appeals purposes in respect of bill of entry entered for home consumption or warehousing
 
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)

Notification No.63/2020-Customs (N.T.)

New Delhi, the 30th July, 2020
 
G.S.R.482(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 92/2017-Customs (N.T.), dated the 28th September, 2017, namely:-
 
In the said notification, in paragraph 1, for the provisos, the following provisos shall be substituted,namely :-
 
“Provided that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Bengaluru, shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against the serial nos.1, 5, and 6 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 7 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-1) Chennai and the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) Chennai, shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 1 and 7 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial nos. 5 and 6 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Delhi, shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against the serial nos.5, 6, and 7of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no.1 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai-I shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 3 and 4 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 2 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai-II shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 2 and 4 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 3 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act:
 
Provided further that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai-III, shall have jurisdiction in relation to an order or decision of the officers sub-ordinate to the officers as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 2 and 3 of the Table above, in respect of the bill of entry entered for home consumption under sub-section (1) of section 46 or for warehousing under section 68 of the said Act for goods imported at a customs station in the jurisdiction of the officer as mentioned in column (3) against serial no. 4 of the Table above and assigned to them electronically in the Customs Automated System for the purposes of sub-section (5) of section 17 and section 18 of the said Act”.
[F.No. 437/48/2014-Cus.IV]
 
ANANTH RATHAKRISHNAN, Dy. Secy. (Customs)
 
Note: The principal Notification No. 92/2017-Customs(N.T.),dated the 28th September, 2017, was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R.1210(E), dated the 28th September, 2017, and was last amended by Notification No. 51/2020-Customs(N.T.),dated the 5th June 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R.353(E) dated the 5th June, 2020.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

First-time experience in filing appeal a reasonable & bona fide cause for delay

First-time experience in filing appeal was a reasonable and bona fide cause for delay – ITAT condoned delay In a…

16 hours ago
  • GST

Non-disclosure of destination place in documents no ground for seizure u/s 129 of GST Act.

Mere nondisclosure of place of destination in the documents cannot be a ground for seizure u/s 129 of GST Act.…

17 hours ago
  • arbitration

Charging of exorbitant interest in commercial transactions not against morality or justice

Imposition of exorbitant interest in contemporary commercial practices not against the fundamental policy of Indian Law, or against the morality…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessees not required to prove “source of the source‟ of funds Prior to Finance Act 2022

Assessees was  not required to prove the “source of the source‟ of funds received as unsecured loans Prior to the…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

During pendency before settlement commission, assessee have right to contest assessment

The contention that during the pendency of case before settlement commission, the assessee must give up his right to contest…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Entire amount of undisclosed money cannot be treated income but only profit embedded

Entire amount of undisclosed money cannot be treated as income and only estimated profit embedded in these transactions may only…

2 days ago