Category: Income Tax
Shocked Supreme Court fines Commissioner Income Tax with fine of Rs 10 lakhs for misleading statement about pendency of a civil appeal ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2495 (2018) 08 SC The instant Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad after a …
Grossing up for TDS was applicable on payment to foreign University for technical services as DTAA did not define the term gross amount-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2494 (2018) 08 HC The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the order of the Income …
Extension of due date for filing Income-tax return by assessees in Kerala from 31st August, 2018 to 15th September, 2018. CBDT Order u/s 119 F.No. 225/242/2018/ITA.II Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes (ITA.II Division) North-Block, New Delhi, the 2. f …
Addition made for low house hold withdrawals from capital upheld by ITAT rejecting the explanation of of joint family living and expenses ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2492 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the order of the CIT(A) in inter …
High Court refuse to entertain writ against reopening notice u/s 148 as benefit of concluded finding of facts was not available because petitioner had directly approached the Court. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2491 (2018) 08 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Income-Tax v. Agarwalla …
Booking of flat is not date of acquisition for claim of capital gain exemption u/s 54F. ITAT upheld denial of exemption as asset was not held for more than 3 years ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2490 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: …
Renovation is part of cost of acquisition for grant of benefit of deduction u/s 54F. Term residential house include all amenities to make it habitable-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2489 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Mrs. Rahana Siraj Vs. CIT (2015) …
The assessee was not prejudiced when AO disallowed only 10% of expenses instead of rejecting the books u/s 145 and pass best judgment assessment order under Section 144- High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2488 (2018) 08 HC The instant appeal was filed by assessee against the …
Concealment Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for claiming capital loss as business loss. No Penalty when the assessee disclosed all the material in the computation of his income.- High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2487 (2018) 08 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT Vs. Siddharth …
Criteria for income tax manual selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the financial-year 2018-2019- CBDT Guidelines Instruction No. 04/2018 Government of IndiaMinistry of FinanceDepartment of RevenueCentral Hoard of Direct Taxes (ITA-II division) North Block New Delhi the 20th August 2018 To All Pr. Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax/Chief-Commissioner of …
