Category: Income Tax
CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB furnished electronically between 01.10.2025 to 31.03.2026. CBDT has condoned the delay in filing Form No. 10AB electronically for approval under clause (ii) of the first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, …
Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is only directory and not mandatory – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Allahabad has reiterated that requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is only directory and not mandatory, recourse to provisions …
Limitation for invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 with respect to issues not covered in re-assessment would start from the original Assessment Order – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that limitation for PCIT to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the …
AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that AO was not justified in rejecting the registered valuer’s report and taking the cost of improvement as Nil, without making a reference to …
Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that the assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent non-resident company towards IT …
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned by a company registered in India In a recent judgment, the High Court has held that the term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA means a project or an …
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash In a recent judgment, ITAT Agra has held that there was no need for addition in the hands of the assessee who was only a carrier of cash …
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent judgment, ITAT has set aside the penalty u/s 271D and remanded the case for determination of whether payment of imprest constitutes a transfer within the meaning of section …
CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale price instead of price mentioned in MoU found during search. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Gujarat High Court quashed notice u/s 263 holding that in case it is …
No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of the searched person – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that when additions have been confirmed in the hands of the searched person therefore, no …