Category: ITAT
No disallowance u/s 54EC for delay in cheque clearance for investment in REC Bonds which was attributable to the banking channel – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2722 (2019) (01) ITAT This appeal by the assessee was directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax …
Frequency, magnitude of transaction in systematic manner no criteria to hold that the assessee is engaged in a business activity of shares – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2721 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Sugamchand C. Shah vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax ; Gopal …
Cash deposited in bank by friend for making DD for participating in tender was not loan or deposits u/s 269SS or 269T- ITAT deleted penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2719 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: OMEC Engineers Vs CIT …
It is common practice in Indian household that ladies share locker for keeping jewellery with family members- ITAT deletes addition made without any enquiry ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2718 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Sunita Nigam Vs. DCIT (Central) (2018) 33 ITJ 837 …
No disallowance merely because vouchers was fresh not faded or torn. When self made vouchers not found false, no addition can be made on presumption ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2717 (2019) (01) ITAT This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of …
Limitation period not prescribed for service of assessment order but it must be served within reasonable time as held by the various high courts – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2715 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs. Subrata Roy,(2014(7) TMI42)ACIT Vs. Orissa Stevedores LtdState of …
Transfer of creditor balances to capital account for better bank loan facilities was not waiver of liability u/s 41(1) being without consent form creditors ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2714 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Income tax Vs Sugauli Sugar Works (P.) Ltd …
Kind of expenditure a legal professional can legitimately and justly claim is entirely different from basic expenditure a commercial entity can claim – SC dismisses SLP of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2713 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Shanti Bhushan v. Commissioner of …
For recomputing income correctly u/s 153A no incriminating material necessary and AO can make corrections after giving opportunity to the assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2712 (2019) (01) ITAT In this case, the assessee had filed additional ground along with petition for admission of additional ground. The …
Deduction u/s 80IA is mandatory for both assessee and revenue to allow/claim, once initial assessment year is selected as there is no choice for postponement – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2711 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs. Ramco International reported in 221 …
