Category: ITAT
Not allowing cross examination legally or factually incorrect. It was strange that FFA held that non providing such opportunity would not vitiate proceedings-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1168 (2017) (03) ITAT Assessment Year : 2005-06 Date/Month of Pronouncement: March, 2017 Brief Facts of the Case: A …
ITAT lacks power to dismiss appeal without adverting to merits -Allahabad High Court In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has reiterated that currently ITAT does not have power to dismiss appeal without adverting to the merits of the appeal even if the appellant is absent. …
Deduction us 54B for land purchased in wife’s name disallowed by ITAT following the judgment of Punjab & Haryana High Court. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1163 (2017) (03) ITAT Assessment Year : 2007-08 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February 2017 Brief Facts of the Case: The appellant assessee sold …
Notice us 271(1)(b) on printed format with tick mark without striking off the non applicable clause quashed on the ground that charge was not specific. ITAT Delhi, in a recent judgment, has quashed notice u/s 271(1)(b) on printed format with only tick mark with striking off the not …
Section 68 additions not applicable to deposits in bank. The bank Pass Book or bank statement are not books of account maintained by the assessee – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1159 (2017) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Smt. Manasi Mahendra Pitkar vs. ITO Bhaichand …
System error showing agricultural income in return to AO. Addition made deleted by the ITAT as in the ITR downloaded such income was NIL ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1158 (2017) (03) ITAT Assessment Year : 2011-12 Brief Facts of the Case: The assessee filed her return …
Gross Profit rate can not be same each year. AO could not step into the shoes of businessman to determine sale price. Addition made for low GP deleted by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1157 (2017) (03) ITAT Assessment Year : 2008-09 Date/Month of Pronouncement: March-2017 Important …
Non-furnishing reopening reasons despite request vitiates the reopening of assessment. Order passed u/s 148 quashed and declared illegal by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1156 (2017) (03) ITAT Question for determination: Whether non-furnishing of the reasons for reopening, after the specific request for the same is made …
Assessment in individual status bad when notice issued to HUF Assessment set aside when notice u/s 148 was issued in the name of HUF-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1155 (2017) (03) ITAT Assessment Year : 2008-09 Date/Month of Pronouncement: March-2017 Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Suraj Mal, …
Disallowance us 40A(3) when income-profits are estimated. ITAT following Allahabad High Court judgment deletes additions for cash payments u/s 40A(3) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1154 (2017) (03) ITAT The Ground of Appeal: In the present appeal, the assessee, inter alia raised a ground challenging the order of …
