Category: ITAT
When quantum additions deleted, penalty u/s 271(1)(b) not leviable for failure to comply with notices u/s 142(1). At best it could be technical & venial default on part of assessee ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3383 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Kabul …
Addition for bogus purchases as unexplained cash credits whether u/s 68 or u/s 41(1) as cessation of liability? No additions on opening balances ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3382 (2020) (09) ITAT In this case appeal was preferred by the Revenue against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax …
No concealment when all information available for determining income given voluntarily by assessee either in return or at the time of assessment ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3380 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Samson Perinchery 392 ITR 4 (Bom). Ventura Textiles Ltd., vs. …
Whether an expenditure is capital or revenue squarely fall within the ambit of a debatable issue. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3379 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Vegan International Ltd. 2 Taxmann.com 140 In the instant case, the …
Depreciation allowable even if asset not used during the year when it formed part of block of assets ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3378 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Norplex Oak India reported in 198 Taxman 0470 In the instant case, the …
Reassessment completed without serving notice u/s 143(2) invalid. Issue and service of notice are jurisdictional requirements ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3377 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Chetan Gupta 382 ITR 613 In the instant case, the assessee had raised additional grounds …
Addition for jewellery found in search deleted as net weight found in search was lower than jewellery found during earlier search despite minor mismatch in items of jewellery. ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3376 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Krishan Kumar Modi versus ACIT …
Revised claim of deduction u/s 80IC allowed without revised return Judgment of Supreme Court applies to AO not appellate Authorities ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3373 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Goetz India Ltd In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …
Second reopening notice u/s 148 issued without completing earlier reassessment proceedings is invalid ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3370 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:A.S.S.P. & Co. vs. CIT 172 ITR 274 (Mad)CIT vs. P. Krishnankutty Menon, 181 ITR 237 (Ker)Tao Publishing (P) Ltd. …
Capital gain to be computed first applying exemption and then provisions for set off of capital loss ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3369 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs Vijay M. Mahtaney 35 taxmann.com 228 (Mad) In the instant case, the assessee had …
