Category: High Courts
Questions/expressions of Ram Jethmalani against Arun Jaitely declared indecent and scandalous by Delhi High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2007 (2017) (07) HC The present petition was filed by Shri Arun Jaitely (Plaintiff) seeking expeditious recording of the evidence in a time bound manner in the …
SC directs ICAI to provide complainant’s statement to CA for alleged misconduct. High Court to interpret Regulation 16 of the CA Regulations 1988. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2006 (2017) (07) HC/SC Brief Facts of the Case: Disciplinary proceedings on the alleged charges of misconduct were initiated …
Tribunal not competent to travel beyond the scope of appeal in making the addition It has to confined itself to questions arising or subject matter of appeal – Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2005 (2017) (07) HC The Substantial Question of Law framed for determination: Whether …
What was not income in earlier years can not be written off as debt. The failure of share broker to return the money was at the highest a business loss and nothing more – Delhi High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2004 (2017) (07) HC The Grievance: …
No illegality if notice us 226(3)(iii) to assessee not issued simultaneously or prior to notice issued to bank for attachment of account u/s 226(3)(i) for recovery of tax demand – Delhi High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2003 (2017) (07) HC The Question involved: An interesting question …
Duplication in alleged entries was a classic case of non-application of mind by AO as he persisted with his belief that such amount had escaped assessment – Delhi High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2002 (2017) (07) HC The Question of Law framed for determination: Did the …
Penalty for failure to deduct tax quashed as NOIDA is exempt from TDS. Assessee was under bonafide belief that tax was not liable to be deducted – Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2001 (2017) (07) HC The Question of Law for determination: Whether the tribunal …
Assessment is concluded if notice u/s 143(2) not issued within stipulated time and in terms of CBDT circular no scrutiny can be started in such cases-Delhi High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1299 (2017) (07) HC The Question framed for determination: “Did the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal …
PAN correction limit of 2 alfa 2 numerical characters only for TDS statements held not permissible. Inocme Tax Department was directed to allow correction- Gujarat High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1298 (2017) (07) HC The Grievance: The petitioner had challenged the action of the Income Tax …
Second visit in the name of concluding search without without finding anything new for being seized could not validate second panchnama for limitation period u/s 153B(2)(a) – Delhi High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1297 (2017) (07) HC The Issue:All the appeals were directed against the order of …
