Category: High Courts

Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action taken. Section 8(1)(h) not applicable-Delhi HC

Fact finding committee report under RTI Act can not be denied if report was submitted and action was taken. Section 8(1)(h) was not applicable-Delhi HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1099 (2017) (01) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The petitioner had challenged order of the Central Information …

Imprest account not necessarily part of partner capital account as held by ITAT was without properly analysing evidence-HC

Imprest account not necessarily part of partner capital account as held by ITAT was based merely on partner’s statement without properly analysing the evidence-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1068 (2016) (11) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The responding assessee was a partnership fir. The return …

Keyman Insurance Policy of partner of firm allowable as business expenditure. CBDT accepts High Court Judgments vide Circular No. 38/2016

Keyman Insurance Policy of partner of firm allowable as business expenditure. CBDT accepts various High Court Judgments on the subject. CIRCULAR NO . 38/2016 F.No.279/Misc./140/2015-ITJ Government  of India Ministry of Finance Central Board of Direct Taxes ****** New Delhi, Dated 22nd November , 2016 Subject: Admissibility of expenditure …

Public Limited Company Corporate Veil lifting us 179 of Income Tax Act is possible with prima-facie sufficient material and confronting assessee with show cause-Gujarat HC

Public Limited Company Corporate Veil lifting us 179 of Income Tax Act is possible with prima-facie sufficient material and confronting assessee with show cause-Gujarat High Court. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1046 (2016) (10) HC Important Case Law Cited: Pravinbhai M. Kheni v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Brief Facts …

Grant-delay of Income Tax Refund-Conduct of AO was disturbing in not grating-delaying refund based on CBDT Instruction No. 1 of 2015 which was set aside

Grant-delay of Income Tax Refund-Conduct of AO was disturbing in not grating-delaying refund based on CBDT Instruction No. 1 of 2015 which was set aside-Bombay High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1045 (2016) (10) HC Assessment Year 2015­16 The Challenge: The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of  India …