Category: ITAT
Limitation period not prescribed for service of assessment order but it must be served within reasonable time as held by the various high courts – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2715 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs. Subrata Roy,(2014(7) TMI42)ACIT Vs. Orissa Stevedores LtdState of …
Transfer of creditor balances to capital account for better bank loan facilities was not waiver of liability u/s 41(1) being without consent form creditors ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2714 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Income tax Vs Sugauli Sugar Works (P.) Ltd …
Kind of expenditure a legal professional can legitimately and justly claim is entirely different from basic expenditure a commercial entity can claim – SC dismisses SLP of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2713 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Shanti Bhushan v. Commissioner of …
For recomputing income correctly u/s 153A no incriminating material necessary and AO can make corrections after giving opportunity to the assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2712 (2019) (01) ITAT In this case, the assessee had filed additional ground along with petition for admission of additional ground. The …
Deduction u/s 80IA is mandatory for both assessee and revenue to allow/claim, once initial assessment year is selected as there is no choice for postponement – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2711 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs. Ramco International reported in 221 …
Penalty proceedings u/s 271D without recording satisfaction in the assessment order held to be illegal following Supreme Court judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2710 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs. Saini Medical Store, 277 ITR 420 (P&H)CIT Vs. Sunil Kumar Goes, 315 ITR 163 (P&H)CIT …
Addition u/s 69C for unexplained marriage expenses deleted by ITAT noting that in Indian society, family members contribute to wedding in family ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2709 (2019) (01) ITAT The assessee had appealed against the order of the CIT(A) in sustaining the addition made by the …
Restriction that Auditor can not be an accountant to value FMV u/s 56 as provided in Rule 11UA is well founded – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2708 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:M/s. Vaani Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO (2018) 172 ITD 629Rameshwaram Strong Glass (P) …
When entire investment/payments for flat purchase was made by the assessee in the name of his daughter, the capital gain was liable to be assessed in the hands of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2705 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Sanjeev Lal v. …
Merely because some of vouchers did not bear the truck number or driver’s name the transport expenses was not ingenuine – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2703 (2019) (01) ITAT The appellant assessee, a Govt. contractor, was aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the lump …
