Category: ITAT
Earlier cash withdrawal can be explained as source for subsequent bank deposit of cash, provided there are no evidence to show that those withdrawals could not be available to as a source for subsequent deposits. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3471 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the …
ITAT remanded invocation of Section 115BBE denying set off of current year loss against income assessed u/s 68. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3470 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Sumati Dayal v. CIT reported in (1995) 214 ITR 801(SC)CIT v. Durga Prasad More (1971) 82 ITR 540 …
Addition for cash deposit remanded as bank account was opened by someone else by forging PAN Card and signature of assessee. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3469 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made …
No TDS u/s 194IA on advance security deposit under JDA as there was no transfer as conditions of Section 2(47)(v) of the Act was not complied ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3468 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Keshub Mahindra v. CGT 70 ITR 1CGT v Smt C …
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposited in bank during demonetization period deleted as cash was deposited by trade debtors ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3465 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Malpani House of Stones Vs CIT (88 taxmaann.com 546) (Raj HC)CIT vs Aggarwal Engg Co. (302 ITR …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on filing revised return when no such questionnaire was issued with notice u/s 143(2) ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3463 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT vs. SSA’s Emerald MeadowsPr. CIT vs. Sahara India Life Insurance Company Ltd.ITO vs. Sitashri Trading & Finance …
Harish Salve gets relief from ITAT. Funding education of Indian law students abroad allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1) as goodwill measure ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3462 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming disallowance of …
Partners salary revised just before end of financial year allowed being in accordance with terms of deed and law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3458 (2021) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition made by the …
Addition u/s 69 for unexplained cash deleted by the Tribunal. It was held that tag of another bank found on cash bundles not to be given weightage as it is a common practice amongst banks to issue currency bundles as received by them ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3457 …
STamp duty valuation not a relevant criteria to decide payment of on-money by assessee but piece of evidence to ascertain correct facts with regard to value of property ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3455 (2021) (02) ITAT Important case law relied referred:ShyamKumar vs. ACIT (2018) 99 Taxman.com 39Pullongode Rubber …
