Category: Judgments
Payment of house rent to wife residing with assessee in the same house is a colourable devise to avoid legitimate payment of the taxes – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2917 (2019) (05) ITAT The assessee was an individual and deriving income from salary. He filed the …
Reopneing-AO had to act on the basis of reasons to believe and not on reasons to suspect. ITAT quashed the reopening of the assessment. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2916 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Aas per AIR information, assessee had sold …
Service Tax notice quashed as pre-show cause notice consultation was mandatory as per CBIC Master Circular. Exception not apply on mere possibility of offence ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2915 (2019) (05) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Acquired Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of …
Non doctor running a hospital is not a professional for tax audit turnover limit purpose, but it is a business activity – ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2914 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A) …
GST Classification of books as Printed Books or Exercise Books-emphasis is on a functional characteristics, the purpose it serves – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2913 (2019) (05) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties The Central Press Private Limited v. Union of India …
Interest is payable u/s 11AB on differential excise duty with retrospective effect due to escalation clause – Supreme Court uphelds Division Bench judgments ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2912 (2019) (05) SC Important Case Laws considered/relied upon by the parties CCE v. SKF India Ltd. 2009 (13) SCC …
Unaccounted tax liabilities to be deducted from reserves for levy of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e). AO should consider the liability while considering the status of the accumulated profit of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2911 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without addition-Quantification of penalty depended upon addition made to the income of the assessee – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2910 (2019) (05) ITAT The assessee was in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the penalty imposed by …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for inadvertently not showing salary from second employer deleted as assessee suo moto recalculated and paid the tax along with interest ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2908 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income …
Expenditure on advertisement and brand promotion allowed in the year in which incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2907 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. v. CIT 225 ITR 802 …
