Category: Supreme Court
SIFO investigation does not come to an end even after expiry of period within which a report has to be submitted u/s 212(3) of the Companies Act 2013 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2846 (2019) (03) SC Under Section 212(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (2013 Act) where …
Excluded employee under EPF Act/Scheme 1952-Supreme Court explains that employee who withdraw accumulations from GPF/ other Funds not covered in the definition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2845 (2019) (03) SC The basic question that arose for determination in the instant case was as to whether the retired …
Mobile Crane Wire Rope an essential part of Mobile Crane and therefore, taxable at the rates prescribed for the Mobile Crane under Rajasthan VAT – SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2844 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties M/s Annapurna Carbon Industries vs. State …
Lack of full declaration in Form 10 of accumulation u/s 11(2) by itself would not be fatal to the claim. Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2842 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT v. Hostel and …
No disallowance u/s 43B for unpaid service tax unless actually received. Supreme Court dismisses the SLP of the Income Tax Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2827 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner of IncomeTax v. Ovira Logistics P. Ltd 377 ITR …
High Court erred in dismissing appeal of Revenue as infructuous because respondent company had been struck off by the RoC – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2825 (2019) (03) SC The instant appeal was filed by the appellant Revenue against the order of the High Court …
Prosecution of company directors in cheque bouncing case u/s 138 of NI Act. Supreme Court explains when High Court can quash petition u/s 482 of CrPC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2824 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Gunamala Sales Private Limited vs. Anu Mehta and Ors., …
High Court erred in relying upon previously set aside order of Settlement Commission and making it a part of their order for issuing writ- SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2813 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Brij Lal & Ors. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, …
Assessee legally obliged to prove receipt of share capital/premium to the satisfaction of AO, failure of which justify addition – Supreme Court summarises emerging principles ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2814 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT v. Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd (2008) …
Deduction u/s 80HH available out of gross profits before insertion of Section 80AB with effect from 1st April, 1981 –Supreme Court overrules its previous judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2808 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Motilal Pesticides (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. …
