Applicability of GST on partially completed flats having identified customers before/after GST regime or where no customers are identified – AAR Ruling
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3116 (2019) (08) AAR
The Applicant was a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017.
The Applicant was engaged in construction and sale of residential apartments and residential complexes under joint development agreements.
The Applicant had executed projects under JDA with Land Owners for .an agreed ratio of built-up area. Construction was commenced during pre-GST regime and continued under GST regime. Substantial portion of the work had. been sub contracted to another registered person.
The applicant had sought advance ruling in respect applicability of GST on partially completed flats i.e.
(a) Partially completed flats having identified customers before GST regime
(b) Partially completed flats where customers are identified after implementation of GST regime, and
(c) Partially completed flats, where no customers are identified.
The Applicant had the following views on the question raised:
Liable to Tax as per earlier law on the value of work executed under earlier law and liable to tax under GST Law only on the ·value of work executed under GST.
Not liable to tax under earlier law on the portion of work executed under earlier la.w, as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in L&T case that the activity / transaction amounts to work contract only from the stage of entering agreement with customer, and attract tax under GST Law on the value of work executed under GST Law.
Not liable to tax under earlier law on the portion of work executed under earlier law, as held by Hon’ble Supreme. Court in L&T.case that the activity /transaction amount.s to works contract only from the stage· of entering agreement with customer, and attract tax under GST law on the value of work executed under GST Law only from the stage of entering agreement with customer.
The Advance Ruling Authority gave the following rulings:
(a) ln respect of Partially completed flats having identified customers before GST regime, the Applicant is liable to pay service tax under the F’inance Act 1994 proportionate to the services provided up to 30.06.2017 and from 01.07.2017 onwards liable to pay GST proportionate to the service provided effective from 01.07.2.017 in terms of Section 142(11)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017.
(b) In respect of partially completed flats, where customers are identified after implementation of GST, the Applicant is liable to pay GST on the transaction value of supply.
(c) In respect of partially completed flats where no customers are identified the applicant is not liable to GST as no supply is involved. However, if the supply is made prior to the issuance of completion certificate then GST is liable to be paid on the transaction value of supply, as in (b) above.
addition u/s 68 addition u/s 69A ca misconduct cash deposit in bank cbdt circular CBDT Instruction cbdt notification cbdt order cbdt press release cgst circular cgst notification cit revision 263 concealment penalty condonation of delay covid-19 custom circular demonetisation due date extension e-way bill faq GST circular GST Council Meeting gst faq gstn advisory GSTR-3B GST rates IBBI ibc icai announcement income tax penalty itat ITAT Delhi mca circular MCA notification penalty 271(1)(c) penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Press Release reasons recorded reopening 148 Reopening us 147 Search & Seizure sebi circular unexplained cash credits validity of notice u/s 148 Withdrawal of 2000 500 Bank Notes
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…