Income Tax

2% TDS on cash withdrawals from banks/post offices with effect from 01.09.2019-New Section 194N

2% TDS on cash withdrawals from banks/post offices with effect from 01.09.2019-New Section 194N

In order to further discourage cash transactions and move towards less cash economy, the Union Budget 2019-20 has proposed to insert a new section 194N.

Section 194N – Payment of certain amounts in cash

The new section provide for levy of TDS at the rate of 2 % on cash payments in excess of one crore rupees in aggregate made during the year, by a banking company or cooperative bank or post office, to any person from an account maintained by the recipient.

It has been proposed to exempt payment made to certain recipients, such as the Government, banking company, cooperative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking, post office, banking correspondents and white label ATM operators, who are involved in the handling of substantial amounts of cash as a part of their business operation, from the application of this provision.

It is proposed to empower the Central Government to exempt other recipients, through a notification in the official Gazette in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India.

This amendment will take effect from 1st September, 2019.

TDS on cash withdrawals per account or in aggregate?

There seems to be some confusion in the minds of public at large as to whether the threshold of Rs. 1 crores is with respect to cash withdrawal per bank account or is it applicable to aggregate withdrawals per bank?

Please note the liability has been fastened on the banking company/co-operative society/post office and not to a branch of it. Secondly the section section clearly talks of “aggregate of sums” paid which leaves no doubt that the said threshold is with respect to per bank/post office and not individual account.

Example-1

A person has one account each with three different banks. He can withdraw  Rs. 1 crores x 3 banks = 3 crores without TDS

Example-2

A person has three account in three different/same branches of one bank. He can withdraw  Rs. 1 crores only without TDS

The text of section 194N is as under:

addition u/s 68 addition u/s 69A ca misconduct cash deposit in bank cbdt circular CBDT Instruction cbdt notification cbdt order cbdt press release cgst circular cgst notification cit revision 263 concealment penalty condonation of delay covid-19 custom circular demonetisation due date extension e-way bill faq GST circular GST Council Meeting gst faq gstn advisory GSTR-3B GST rates IBBI ibc icai announcement income tax penalty itat ITAT Delhi mca circular MCA notification penalty 271(1)(c) penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Press Release reasons recorded reopening 148 Reopening us 147 Search & Seizure sebi circular unexplained cash credits validity of notice u/s 148 Withdrawal of 2000 500 Bank Notes

Share

View Comments

  • Two different current accounts with different Company Names, but have same proprietor in same branch - can both accounts be used for One Crore each withdrawal separately Also will one crore be counted as from 1 September 2019 to 31 March 2020. Or 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020. Please Reply.

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

3 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago