Penalty 271(1)(c) for claiming higher Housing Loan Interest deduction u/s 24(b) deleted. AO did not detect it but noticed from reply of assessee

Penalty 271(1)(c) for claiming higher Housing Loan Interest deduction u/s 24(b) deleted. AO did not detect it but noticed from reply of assessee

February 12, 2017 Income Tax, ITAT, Judgments
Penalty 271(1)(c) for claiming higher Housing Loan Interest deduction u/s 24(b) deleted. The AO did not detect mistake but noticed it from the reply of the assessee – ITAT Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1124 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2008-09 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 …
Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not that of the AO-Allahabad HC Judgment

Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not that of the AO-Allahabad HC Judgment

February 11, 2017 High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments
Limitation Period us 153-Contention was that ITAT had set aside Assessment order of CIT-A only and not order of the Assessing Officer-Allahabad HC Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1123 (2017) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs Purshottamdas T. Patel, reported in 209 ITR 52 …
CPC intimation us 143(1) applying MMR on AOP trust invalid as jurisdiction limited for disallowing only prima facie inadmissible deductions

CPC intimation us 143(1) applying MMR on AOP trust invalid as jurisdiction limited for disallowing only prima facie inadmissible deductions

February 10, 2017 Income Tax, ITAT, Judgments
CPC intimation us 143(1) applying MMR on AOP trust invalid as jurisdiction limited for disallowing only prima facie inadmissible deductions, allowances – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1122 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2013-14 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: J.K.S. Employees …