Tag: capital gain deduction u/s 54
Withdrawal of deduction u/s 54/54F beyond scope of rectification u/s 154. AO has no jurisdiction to re-appreciate evidences already considered. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3294 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:T.S. Balaram, Income Tax Officer vs Volkart Brothers & Ors, 82 ITR 50 …
Exemption u/s 54/54F for house purchased in wife name, Deduction allowed for change in jurisdictional High Court with favourable judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3292 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT, Faridabad vs Dinesh VermaCIT vs., Kamal Wahal 351 ITR4CIT vs. Ravinder Kumar …
Benefit of exemption u/s 54F before its amendment can be extended to a residential house purchased outside India. ITAT allowed claim ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3195 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Anurag Pandit The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the …
Exemption u/s 54F could not be denied for fraud by builder in constructing building without NOC not disclosed to the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3101 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Kanan Chandra Sekhar vs. ITO, 165 ITD 315Dileep Ranjrekar, 101 taxman.com 104Balkishan …
Allowability of Exemption u/s 54 where new residential property used partly for commercial purposes . ITAT remanded case for verification of the proposition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3100 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Seema Sabharwala vs. Income Tax OfficerM. Subramanian vs. DCIT i …
Section 54F exemption not require that land on which construction of property is made must be owned by the assessee. Land and super structure are two different assets ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3064 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Shri Ganesh Chawla vs. ACIT …
Exemption u/s 54F for plot in the name of HUF allowed by ITAT following High Court judgment as members of HUF were not stranger and money was contributed by assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2817 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT …
Deduction u/s 54 allowed for property purchased from wife by General Power of Attorney as transfer of immovable property by a General Power of Attorney constitute transfer of capital asset. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2594 (2018) (10) ITAT The appellant assessee’s appeal was directed against the order passed …
Capital gain Exemption u/s 54 can not be denied for new property purchased in joint names of self wife & daughter when the amount was actually invested-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2481 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT vs. Kamal Wahal (2013) 351 ITR …
Section 54 Exemption not require utilisation of sale proceeds of original capital asset only. Investment out of bank loan and owned fund allowable- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2421 (2018) 07 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against an order passed by the Commissioner …