Tag: Delhi High Court

Service tax Department can not audit under rule 5A2-Delhi HC quashes/Strikes down Rule 5A2 and Notification 23/2014 Circular 181/7/2014 Ultra Vires to FA

Service tax Department can not audit under rule 5A(2)-Delhi High Court quashes/Strikes down Rule 5A2 and Notification 23/2014 Circular 181/7/2014 Ultra Vires to Finance Act. Case Law Details: W.P.(C) 5192/2015 & CM No. 9417/2015 Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd (Petitioner) vs. UOI and Ors (Respondents) Date of Judgment: 03/06/2016 …

Fresh tangible material not required to reopen if return processed u/s 143(1) and intimation is sent. AO to form only reasons to believe that income escaped-Delhi High Court

Fresh tangible material not required to reopen an assessment where the initially the return of income is processed u/s 143(1) and an intimation is sent to the assessee, the reopening of such assessment requires the AO to form reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment, but such reasons do …

Reopening us 147 148 invalid if assessee replied questionnaire raising specific queries during original assessment as it would amount to change of opinion

Reopening us 147 148 invalid if assessee replied questionnaire raising specific queries during original assessment as it would amount to change of opinion-Delhi High Court. Case Law Details: WP(C) 2526/2015 Allied Strips Limited (Petitioner) vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax  (Respondent) Date of Judgment: 12/05/2016 Coram: Justice Sanjeev …

CBDT Instruction No 1-2015 held illegal and quashed by Delhi High Court. Refunds not to be denied to assessees for notices issued u/s 143(2) cases

CBDT Instruction No 1-2015 held illegal and quashed by Delhi High Court It further directed that the said instruction shall not be relied upon to deny refunds to the Assessees in whose cases notices might have been issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Case Law Details: …

PE under Indo-US DTAA-Adobe India not PE of Adobe Systems USA as agent must have authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the enterprise

PE under Indo-US DTAA-Adobe India not PE of Adobe Systems USA as agent must have authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the enterprise-Delhi High Court Case Details: WP(C) 2384, 2385, 2390 of 2013 Adobe Systems Incorporated  (Petitioner) vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax & Anr (Respondents) Date of …

Deduction u/s 80-O computed applying average net profit margin for domestic income not considering fixed costs was distorted apportionment-Delhi High Court

In its  latest judgment , Delhi High Court has held that deduction under Section 80-O of the Income tax Act, 1961 computed applying average profit margin for domestic income and not considering fixed costs was a distorted apportionment of net profit. Case Law Details: ITA 264/2002 ITA 415/2004 M/s Continental Carriers …… …
Subscribe to ABCAUS Newsletter

Get reliable, authentic and latest updates on taxation/corporate and other laws in your mail box free.



After subscribing, please check your email (including spam or junk folder) and activate the subscription link by clicking it.