Tag: jewellery found in search

Loss of jewellery seized and kept in bank custody amounts to loss by Income Tax Authorities and payment of said jewellery has to be made by the Income Tax Authorities. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court has held that the loss of jewellery seized by Income Tax …

Seizure of jewellery held valid in view of assessee’s failure to substantiate the legitimacy of jewellery, discrepancies in documentation and weight In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Calcutta High Court held that the seizure of the jewellery was valid in view of the assessee’s failure to substantiate the legitimacy …

Addition u/s 69A deleted as there was no difference in the quantity of jewellery found during search and jewellery declared in the wealth tax return. In a recent judgment, ITAT Hyderabad deleted addition u/s 69A as Assessing Officer (AO) made addition only on the basis of value of …

Jewellery found in search can not be apportioned equally among family members – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that when jewellery found in house cohabited by various family members, AO can not apportion jewellery in equal proportion without identifying the person to whom the …

Merely on basis of unsigned document it cannot be assumed that amount/price paid is as stated in said document – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Hyderabad has held that merely on the basis of an unsigned document it cannot be assumed that price paid is as …

CBDT Instruction 1916 on exclusion of jewellery confined only to the stage of seizure during search In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Madras High Court has held that CBDT Instruction 1916 on exclusion of jewellery is confined only at the stage of seizure during search and not to the …

Diamond jewellery is always studded with gold and loose diamonds were found during search operation, ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A  ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3832 (2024) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the order of the …

Explanation that jewellery was acquired out of agricultural income of Bigger HUF before its partition cannot be termed as not plausible – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3753 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition …

There is no provision in the Income Tax Act to tax the difference between value of jewellery declared and jewellery found in search as deemed sale ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3744 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …

Drawings and returned income speak volumes about richness of family – ITAT deleted addition for jewellery found during search. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3737 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Ashok Chaddha vs. ITO 14 taxman.com 57 In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …