Tag: order u/s 148A(d)

Department can’t suo motu issue a new PAN when assesseee have a valid PAN under which returns are filed. In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Patna High Court quashed re-assessment order as notices and the assessment order showed a new PAN number suo motu issued by the department …

Reopening proceedings upheld though the notice u/s 148 wrongly stated that no return was filed as reopening was not based on non-filing of ITR In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Bombay High Court upheld the initiation of reopening proceedings u/s 147 where though the notice u/s 148A(d) wrongly stated …

Minimum 7 days time to furnish reply to notice u/s 148A(b) was not required in cases covered by search – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Surat dismissed the jurisdictional challenge to the validity of notice u/s 148 on the ground of less than 7 days time …

Order u/s 148A(d) quashed as show cause notice u/s 148A(b) was issued to the email address of demised director after his death In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Karnataka High Court quashed the order u/s 148A(d) and the show cause notice u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 …

There is no provision in Income Tax Act for discounting the time spent during the pendency of proceedings against the deceased assessee while computing the limitation period for initiating the proceedings against his Legal Representatives. In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court has held that there …

Source of cash deposit being savings and family support plausible to certain extent –ITAT deleted addition on account of cash deposit in bank. In a recent judgment, ITAT Visakhapatnam partly deleted addition for cash deposit in bank considering that the assessee’s submission regarding accumulation of savings and receipt …

Proceedings under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 necessarily required to be completed within the period available for issuing notice under Section 148 In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that proceedings under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 necessarily required …

Order passed under Section 148A(d) quashed as it incorrectly mentioned that no reply was filed by the assessee. In a recent judgment, Rajasthan High Court quashed  order passed under Section 148A(d) as it incorrectly mentioned that no reply was filed by the assessee whereas reply was duly uploaded …

High Court penalised Assessing Officer to pay cost of Rs. 50000/- to assessee for unnecessary harassment during the course of re-assesment proceedings u/s 148A(d) In a recent judgment, a division bench of the Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court directed AO to pay cost of Rs. 50000/- for unnecessary harassment …

AO whether obliged to decided pointwise objection of assessee in response to notice u/s 148A(b) – Supreme Court admits SLP of the assessee  In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court had held that all merit objections raised by the assessee in response to a notice issued …